This revision of the PKCS#7 S/MIME handling series is based on (and
very similar to) the series sent on the thread starting at
id:20200430201328.725651-1-...@fifthhorseman.net
However, it is rebased after more gracefully handling the subtle
errors in X.509 certificate validity when built against o
Tomi Ollila writes:
> Reproducer in case gmime version is less than 3.2.7 -- with newer
> gmimes that has to work so if that ever broke in newer gmimes we'd
> notice (reproducer could hide that).
>
>>
>> Any other suggestions?
>>
I guess it depends how many distros you think will patch this. It'
On Mon, May 04 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Tomi--
>
> On Sat 2020-05-02 00:15:57 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> I did not see anything suspicious in code, but
>>
>> I got these test failures:
>>
>> in ubuntu 19.10 native environment, and
>>
>> in debian 10 (podman) container running in fed
Hi Tomi--
On Sat 2020-05-02 00:15:57 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> I did not see anything suspicious in code, but
>
> I got these test failures:
>
> in ubuntu 19.10 native environment, and
>
> in debian 10 (podman) container running in fedora 31 system
>
>
> T355-smime: Testing S/MIME signature veri
On Thu, Apr 30 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> This series applies after the "Add tests for S/MIME PKCS#7 messages"
> series, which was introduced in
> id:20200428185723.660184-1-...@fifthhorseman.net
>
> With this series applied, notmuch handles standard PKCS#7 S/MIME
> messages (using GnuPG's
This series applies after the "Add tests for S/MIME PKCS#7 messages"
series, which was introduced in
id:20200428185723.660184-1-...@fifthhorseman.net
With this series applied, notmuch handles standard PKCS#7 S/MIME
messages (using GnuPG's gpgsm as a backend, as mediated by GMime's use
of GPGME) as