On Fri 19 Jun 2020 at 09:30 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Patrick Totzke writes:
>> Just to clarify: alot does not, and will not, depend on packages being on
>> PyPI
Ah, my bad. I got some github threads mixed up and assumed this had to
do with alot.
> Notmuch as a project
Patrick Totzke writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First off, thanks for your work on notmuch2, Floris!
>
> Just to clarify: alot does not, and will not, depend on packages being on PyPI
> and is not intended to be installed through pip. I simply don't want to
> provide
> support
Hi everyone,
First off, thanks for your work on notmuch2, Floris!
Just to clarify: alot does not, and will not, depend on packages being on PyPI
and is not intended to be installed through pip. I simply don't want to provide
support for this.
This said, I don't think it is difficult to automate
Hi Thore, notmuch folks,
I noticed that Thore published notmuch2 on PyPI. I think this is
because alot needs it's users to be able to pull it in as a dependency
using the normal Python mechanisms?
It seems this is currently published from a fork at
https://github.com/weilbith/notmuch2-python
make a new release if supporting new features or a new release
> that breaks backword compatability. It also will make it easier to build
> the python libraries standalone using the installed versions of the C
> library, which I suspect might make pypi support a lot easier.
Currently the notmuch
Looks like remnants from the first time it was there. I'll update that link
but it may take a bit, PyPI is being upgraded so the upload mechanism is
down currently.
Julian
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Justus Winter
4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
Hi :)
Quoting Julian Berman
Looks like remnants from the first time it was there. I'll update that link
but it may take a bit, PyPI is being upgraded so the upload mechanism is
down currently.
Julian
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Justus Winter <
4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Hi :)
>
>
Hi :)
Quoting Julian Berman (2013-05-26 16:27:31)
> I've queried gently to find out if anyone was interested in putting the Python
> bindings back on PyPI a few times in IRC before, and didn't really see much
> interest one way or the other. I saw a mailing list post that seemed
>
Hi,
I've queried gently to find out if anyone was interested in putting the
Python bindings back on PyPI a few times in IRC before, and didn't really
see much interest one way or the other. I saw a mailing list post that
seemed indifferent, though it brought up that version mismatches would
cause
Hi :)
Quoting Julian Berman (2013-05-26 16:27:31)
I've queried gently to find out if anyone was interested in putting the Python
bindings back on PyPI a few times in IRC before, and didn't really see much
interest one way or the other. I saw a mailing list post that seemed
indifferent, though
Hi,
I've queried gently to find out if anyone was interested in putting the
Python bindings back on PyPI a few times in IRC before, and didn't really
see much interest one way or the other. I saw a mailing list post that
seemed indifferent, though it brought up that version mismatches would
cause
Quoting Patrick Gerken (2013-05-22 12:08:30)
Quoting Justus Winter (2013-05-21 14:54:02)
Hi :)
Quoting David Bremner (2013-05-20 16:32:32)
Patrick Gerken notm...@patrick-gerken.de writes:
I would not object to that, but David has a point here. If the version
you get from pypi
Quoting Patrick Gerken (2013-05-22 12:08:30)
> Quoting Justus Winter (2013-05-21 14:54:02)
> > Hi :)
> >
> > Quoting David Bremner (2013-05-20 16:32:32)
> > > Patrick Gerken writes:
> > I would not object to that, but David has a point here. If the version
Hi :)
Quoting David Bremner (2013-05-20 16:32:32)
> Patrick Gerken writes:
> > Is there any rationale that prevents registering the python bindings
> > on pypi?
I believe the python bindings were once available on pypi, though that
might have been a relict from the time the pytho
Hi :)
Quoting David Bremner (2013-05-20 16:32:32)
Patrick Gerken notm...@patrick-gerken.de writes:
Is there any rationale that prevents registering the python bindings
on pypi?
I believe the python bindings were once available on pypi, though that
might have been a relict from the time
Hi,
I noticed that the python bindings of notmuch are not available via pypi.
It seems that in the past something was registered but is not any longer.
Without the bindings, it is not possible to use python packages that
depend on notmuch within virtualenv. Virtualenv is a widely used app
to run
Patrick Gerken writes:
>
> Is there any rationale that prevents registering the python bindings
> on pypi?
> If this is only because of missing maintainer, would anybody
> object if I put the bindings on pypi?
I imagine the python bindings are pretty dependent on the version of
no
Hi,
I noticed that the python bindings of notmuch are not available via pypi.
It seems that in the past something was registered but is not any longer.
Without the bindings, it is not possible to use python packages that
depend on notmuch within virtualenv. Virtualenv is a widely used app
to run
Patrick Gerken notm...@patrick-gerken.de writes:
Is there any rationale that prevents registering the python bindings
on pypi?
If this is only because of missing maintainer, would anybody
object if I put the bindings on pypi?
I imagine the python bindings are pretty dependent on the version
19 matches
Mail list logo
