On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:34:16PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
>
> > Of course this does not help me solve my original goal, but I guess now
> > I can try different queries based on your idea.
>
> Ah I see. Your
Hi Jani,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 06:53:53PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2015 6:32 PM, "Suvayu Ali" wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:54:30AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > First note that I believe notmuch search is case insensitive by
> > >
On Jul 18, 2015 6:32 PM, "Suvayu Ali" wrote:
>
> Hi Xu,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:54:30AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> >
> > First note that I believe notmuch search is case insensitive by
> > default, so your grep should be case insensitive as well.
>
> Good
Hi Xu,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:54:30AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>
> First note that I believe notmuch search is case insensitive by
> default, so your grep should be case insensitive as well.
Good point, I tried that, didn't change the numbers much. The number of
matches from grep went up to
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Suvayu Ali
wrote:
> Of course this does not help me solve my original goal, but I guess now
> I can try different queries based on your idea.
Ah I see. Your goal is to search for phrases close to "no plain text".
But if you use
Hi Lewis,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:48:57AM -0500, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
>
> 1. Perhaps you are remembering the "no plain text" message incorrectly?
>For example, the message could have referred to "text/plain" or
>"plaintext" (no space). These would be sufficiently different to not
>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Suvayu Ali
wrote:
> Hi Lewis,
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:48:57AM -0500, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
>>
>> 1. Perhaps you are remembering the "no plain text" message incorrectly?
>>For example, the message could have referred to
Hi Xu,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:54:30AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
First note that I believe notmuch search is case insensitive by
default, so your grep should be case insensitive as well.
Good point, I tried that, didn't change the numbers much. The number of
matches from grep went up to 24,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lewis,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:48:57AM -0500, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
1. Perhaps you are remembering the no plain text message incorrectly?
For example, the message could have referred to text/plain or
On Jul 18, 2015 6:32 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Xu,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:54:30AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
First note that I believe notmuch search is case insensitive by
default, so your grep should be case insensitive as well.
Good point, I tried that,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:34:16PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Suvayu Ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course this does not help me solve my original goal, but I guess now
I can try different queries based on your idea.
Ah I see. Your goal is to
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Suvayu Ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course this does not help me solve my original goal, but I guess now
I can try different queries based on your idea.
Ah I see. Your goal is to search for phrases close to no plain text.
But if you use fuzzy
Hi,
I'm trying to find those annoying emails which have useless plain text
parts. As I recall, they had a phrase something along the lines of "not
available in plain text" or "no plain text". So of course I searched
for "plain text". But that returns hundreds of messages with no obvious
On 7/17/15 7:11 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find those annoying emails which have useless plain
> text parts. As I recall, they had a phrase something along the lines
> of "not available in plain text" or "no plain text". So of course I
> searched for "plain text". But that
Hi,
I'm trying to find those annoying emails which have useless plain text
parts. As I recall, they had a phrase something along the lines of not
available in plain text or no plain text. So of course I searched
for plain text. But that returns hundreds of messages with no obvious
matches, I
On 7/17/15 7:11 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find those annoying emails which have useless plain
text parts. As I recall, they had a phrase something along the lines
of not available in plain text or no plain text. So of course I
searched for plain text. But that returns
16 matches
Mail list logo