- "Carl Worth" a ?crit :
> Once we fix that, I think we can go back to having tag operations
> only
> affect matched messages in the search view, and I agree that this
> will
> be extremely convenient.
>
What about using prefixes to each command, the way Gnus does it*? For instance,
'd'
- Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org a écrit :
Once we fix that, I think we can go back to having tag operations
only
affect matched messages in the search view, and I agree that this
will
be extremely convenient.
What about using prefixes to each command, the way Gnus does it*? For
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:28:49 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:59:13 -0400, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > I actually *really* don't like that the space bar does this. In fact, I
> > build my own notmuch-show-advance function in a notmuch-hacks.el that I
> > load
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:18:30 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> Which is all just to say that I think that archiving is just a special
> case of tagging/untagging, and that the issues raised here should be
> considered across the larger general case.
I do agree that archiving is just a
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:59:13 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I actually *really* don't like that the space bar does this. In fact, I
> build my own notmuch-show-advance function in a notmuch-hacks.el that I
> load to expressly get around this.
Well we definitely do need that operation ("advance
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:59:13 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I actually *really* don't like that the space bar does this. In fact, I
build my own notmuch-show-advance function in a notmuch-hacks.el that I
load to expressly get around this.
Well we definitely do need
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:18:30 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
Which is all just to say that I think that archiving is just a special
case of tagging/untagging, and that the issues raised here should be
considered across the larger general case.
I do agree that archiving is just
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:07:37 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> I am always confused about the behavior of 'a' - does it archive the
> current message? Or the current thread? Or the current thread down to
> where I am? Or (as you propose) just the open messages?
>
> I think we really need to spend
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:41:17 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> A bad bug occurs when paging through the thread with the space
> bar. After showing me these few messages, it will then proceed to
> archive *all* the messages in the thread (not only those it showed
> me). And I'm likely to be unaware of
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:41:17 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Some people will claim (and I've even agreed) that the space bar is too
> magic. But this bug also happens with an explicit command to archive the
> current thread (such as hitting 'a').
>
> I think the fix is to change these commands to
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:41:17 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> One of the searches that I use most frequently, (for mail that I want to
> respond to on a fairly timely basis), is
>
> tag:inbox and tag:to-me [*]
>
> Sometimes, this search will show a large mailing-list thread with only a
One of the searches that I use most frequently, (for mail that I want to
respond to on a fairly timely basis), is
tag:inbox and tag:to-me [*]
Sometimes, this search will show a large mailing-list thread with only a
few messages open. Perhaps part-way through the thread, someone
One of the searches that I use most frequently, (for mail that I want to
respond to on a fairly timely basis), is
tag:inbox and tag:to-me [*]
Sometimes, this search will show a large mailing-list thread with only a
few messages open. Perhaps part-way through the thread, someone
13 matches
Mail list logo
