Re: Update on 0.3 progress

2010-04-22 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:11:14 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Most of what came in in response to this request has now been merged. Notable things that made the merge window but have not been merged yet include... Hi Carl, Just wanted to call one more thing to your attention: the

Update on 0.3 progress

2010-04-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:11:14 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:32:25 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > I know that I want to merge David Edmunson's rewrite of the emacs > > interface to be built on top of --format=json and add a ton of features, > > (better attachment handling,

Update on 0.3 progress

2010-04-21 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:32:25 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > I know that I want to merge David Edmunson's rewrite of the emacs > interface to be built on top of --format=json and add a ton of features, > (better attachment handling, notmuch-hello, etc.). I think that's more > than enough to justify a

Update on 0.3 progress

2010-04-21 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:32:25 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I know that I want to merge David Edmunson's rewrite of the emacs interface to be built on top of --format=json and add a ton of features, (better attachment handling, notmuch-hello, etc.). I think that's more than enough

Re: Update on 0.3 progress

2010-04-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:11:14 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:32:25 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I know that I want to merge David Edmunson's rewrite of the emacs interface to be built on top of --format=json and add a ton of features, (better