On Thu, Nov 29 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I think it would be trivial to add Gmail-style folders to notmuch.
> Maybe a configuration that maps directories with tags. This in fact
> wouldn't even be Gmail specific, and would help the people coming from
> procmail, and other ways of organizing
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Michal Nazarewicz
> wrote:
>> Go nag developers of whatever you are using to implement fetching labels
>> from Gmail. Or write another tool that does that.
On Thu, Nov 29 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Why do that when I can do it in notmuch?
Because you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/11/12 19:39, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28 2012, David Bremner wrote:
>> Right. But without that, the whole thing could be scripted pretty easily I
>> think, just parse
>> the x-labels header and use notmuch-deliver or something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/11/12 08:18, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Jeremy Nickurak
> wrote:
>> Doing this on a directory basis is a non-starter for me. The reason that
>> Notmuch and gmail
>> are a natural fit is that they both operate
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Jeremy Nickurak
wrote:
> Doing this on a directory basis is a non-starter for me. The reason that
> Notmuch and gmail are a natural fit is that they both operate on labels/tags
> instead of folders.
There's no simpler way if you are using IMAP and Maildir, and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> Not everybody uses offlineimap.
>
> Go nag developers of whatever you are using to implement fetching labels
> from Gmail. Or write another tool that does that.
Why do that when I can do
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>
>> >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is
>> >> terrible idea, since this
>> >> would mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/11/12 19:39, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, David Bremner wrote:
Right. But without that, the whole thing could be scripted pretty easily I
think, just parse
the x-labels header and use notmuch-deliver or something like that.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Michal Nazarewicz min...@mina86.com wrote:
Go nag developers of whatever you are using to implement fetching labels
from Gmail. Or write another tool that does that.
On Thu, Nov 29 2012, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do that when I
On Thu, Nov 29 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
I think it would be trivial to add Gmail-style folders to notmuch.
Maybe a configuration that maps directories with tags. This in fact
wouldn't even be Gmail specific, and would help the people coming from
procmail, and other ways of organizing
Doing this on a directory basis is a non-starter for me. The reason that
Notmuch and gmail are a natural fit is that they both operate on
labels/tags instead of folders.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> Right. But without that, the whole thing could be scripted pretty easily
> I think, just parse the x-labels header and use notmuch-deliver or
> something like that.
You're saying to get offlineimap to add the x-labels header and than
have another simple
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> I could not find it in the docs (looked wiki mainly) but one of the
> principles notmuch currently operates that the *contents* of the email
> files it reads are not ever modified. i.e. the email files are read-only
> from notmuch (cli) point of view.
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Not everybody uses offlineimap.
Go nag developers of whatever you are using to implement fetching labels
from Gmail. Or write another tool that does that. Either way,
communicating with Gmail is not notmuch's job.
--
Best regards,
On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
> >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is
terrible idea, since this
> >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.
> >
> > My
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
...
>> Well - it is ust my feeling that the lesser changes are done to the
>> email and its headers, the better.
>
> Sure, but I don't think it's such a big issue, as it may be presented.
> If there was
Michal Nazarewicz writes:
> On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> I could not find it in the docs (looked wiki mainly) but one of the
>> principles notmuch currently operates that the *contents* of the email
>> files it reads are not ever modified. i.e. the email files are read-only
>>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible
>> idea, since this
>> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.
>
> My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/11/12 21:01, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> I saw on the offlineimap mailing list, that somebody is using this approach
>> (x-header) to
>> sync the gmail labels and to use them in his email client - so
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible
idea, since this
would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.
My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing,
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
...
Well - it is ust my feeling that the lesser changes are done to the
email and its headers, the better.
Sure, but I don't think it's such a big issue, as it may be presented.
If there was some
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Not everybody uses offlineimap.
Go nag developers of whatever you are using to implement fetching labels
from Gmail. Or write another tool that does that. Either way,
communicating with Gmail is not notmuch's job.
--
Best regards,
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:
I could not find it in the docs (looked wiki mainly) but one of the
principles notmuch currently operates that the *contents* of the email
files it reads are not ever modified. i.e. the email files are read-only
from notmuch (cli) point of view.
This
Michal Nazarewicz min...@mina86.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:
I could not find it in the docs (looked wiki mainly) but one of the
principles notmuch currently operates that the *contents* of the email
files it reads are not ever modified. i.e. the email files are
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, David Bremner wrote:
Right. But without that, the whole thing could be scripted pretty easily
I think, just parse the x-labels header and use notmuch-deliver or
something like that.
You're saying to get offlineimap to add the x-labels header and than
have another simple
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Michal Nazarewicz min...@mina86.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Not everybody uses offlineimap.
Go nag developers of whatever you are using to implement fetching labels
from Gmail. Or write another tool that does that.
Why do that
Doing this on a directory basis is a non-starter for me. The reason that
Notmuch and gmail are a natural fit is that they both operate on
labels/tags instead of folders.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Jeremy Nickurak
not-m...@trk.nickurak.ca wrote:
Doing this on a directory basis is a non-starter for me. The reason that
Notmuch and gmail are a natural fit is that they both operate on labels/tags
instead of folders.
There's no simpler way if you are using
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> I saw on the offlineimap mailing list, that somebody is using this approach
> (x-header) to sync the gmail labels and to use them in his email client -
> so I thought, why not read them as tags into notmuch and sync tgs back, so
> one would have a sync
On 27 November 2012 20:24, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> > Yes - offlineimap is not needed actually, but I personally I see
> > notmuch as an indexing / tagging program for a mailabox in maildir
> > format, which means local. So all changes are done
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Yes - offlineimap is not needed actually, but I personally I see
> notmuch as an indexing / tagging program for a mailabox in maildir
> format, which means local. So all changes are done locally, and not
> bad on an imap server (or synching tags with an
On 27 November 2012 18:00, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> > So from your point of view - what would be the best / most consistent
> > approach with gmail? Sync All Mail folder (and Inbox) with offlineimap
> > and sync the label information via notmuch?
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> So from your point of view - what would be the best / most consistent
> approach with gmail? Sync All Mail folder (and Inbox) with offlineimap
> and sync the label information via notmuch? Would definitely seem to
> make sense, as it deals with labels on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/11/12 18:49, David Bremner wrote:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> Adding a layer to communicate with a remote server (gmail in this case)
>> would defy the
>> purpose of having notmuch. In my opinion, Synching from gmail to local
>> maildir
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
So from your point of view - what would be the best / most consistent
approach with gmail? Sync All Mail folder (and Inbox) with offlineimap
and sync the label information via notmuch? Would definitely seem to
make sense, as it deals with labels on the
On 27 November 2012 18:00, Michal Nazarewicz min...@mina86.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
So from your point of view - what would be the best / most consistent
approach with gmail? Sync All Mail folder (and Inbox) with offlineimap
and sync the label information via
On 27 November 2012 20:24, Michal Nazarewicz min...@mina86.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Yes - offlineimap is not needed actually, but I personally I see
notmuch as an indexing / tagging program for a mailabox in maildir
format, which means local. So all changes are
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
I saw on the offlineimap mailing list, that somebody is using this approach
(x-header) to sync the gmail labels and to use them in his email client -
so I thought, why not read them as tags into notmuch and sync tgs back, so
one would have a sync
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/11/12 21:01, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
I saw on the offlineimap mailing list, that somebody is using this approach
(x-header) to
sync the gmail labels and to use them in his email client - so I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/11/12 15:44, David Bremner wrote:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> there is a patch available for synching gmail labels to X-Keywords in the
>> message (full
>> thread see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.offlineimap.general/5943
>> ).
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Adding a layer to communicate with a remote server (gmail in this
> case) would defy the purpose of having notmuch. In my opinion,
> Synching from gmail to local maildir should be done by another tool,
> and this synching includes the synching of the gmail labels.
Well,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
there is a patch available for synching gmail labels to X-Keywords in the
message (full thread see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.offlineimap.general/5943 ).
Would notmuch be able to translate these X-Keywords into tags, so that one
Rainer M Krug writes:
> there is a patch available for synching gmail labels to X-Keywords in
> the message (full thread see
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.offlineimap.general/5943 ).
>
> Would notmuch be able to translate these X-Keywords into tags, so that
> one could use notmuch
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com writes:
there is a patch available for synching gmail labels to X-Keywords in
the message (full thread see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.offlineimap.general/5943 ).
Would notmuch be able to translate these X-Keywords into tags, so that
one could
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com writes:
Adding a layer to communicate with a remote server (gmail in this
case) would defy the purpose of having notmuch. In my opinion,
Synching from gmail to local maildir should be done by another tool,
and this synching includes the synching of the gmail
45 matches
Mail list logo
