new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-04-25 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
Quick! While cworth is working I want to push this back to the top of the queue! crypto branch is still ready for merge! git://finestructure.net/notmuch Thanks! jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-04-25 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
Quick! While cworth is working I want to push this back to the top of the queue! crypto branch is still ready for merge! git://finestructure.net/notmuch Thanks! jamie. pgpU4YPWyQSEZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list

signed/encrypted tagging in crypto branch [was: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-03-05 Thread Jameson Rollins
Hey, folks. I just pushed a couple of patches to my "crypto" branch [0] that add support for auto-tagging of multipart/signed and multipart/encrypted messages with the "signed" and "encrypted" tags respectively. Only new messages are thus tagged, so a database rebuild is required to auto-tag old

signed/encrypted tagging in crypto branch [was: Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-03-05 Thread Jameson Rollins
Hey, folks. I just pushed a couple of patches to my crypto branch [0] that add support for auto-tagging of multipart/signed and multipart/encrypted messages with the signed and encrypted tags respectively. Only new messages are thus tagged, so a database rebuild is required to auto-tag old

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-03-01 Thread Simon Fondrie-Teitler
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:24:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:41:48 +, Darren McGuicken fernseed.info> wrote: > I also run the crypto branch since it has been published and it is > working just fine. I have just started using the crypto branch, and after a few

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Rob Browning
Jameson Rollins writes: > If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't > themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm > inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name. Are persistent tags required here? The original question at

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > Are persistent tags required here? The original question at least, > seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has > encrypted or signed bits. So I wondered if that might be accomplished > without actual tags. Hey,

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:08:39 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > The outstanding question in my mind is whether those tags could be > mistaken by a na?ve user for meaning one of the other concepts. Is > there a way to name the tags to minimize that kind of confusion? I think that would be

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/28/2011 02:56 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:59:54 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >> But: what does the "signed" tag mean? i wouldn't want to necessarily >> conflate these four ideas: > > These are good points, Daniel. However, I had actually

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:41:48 +, Darren McGuicken wrote: > If feedback is needed here then likewise, I've been running the crypto > branch since it was made available. The only strangeness I've seen was > that which was reported in id:"87sjw2h6xy.fsf at bookbinder.fernseed.info" > for expired

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/28/2011 01:25 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:52:45 -0500, Ross Glover > wrote: >> I too am now running the crypto branch and find it quite amazing. The >> one feature I would like added, though, is some face color or >> auto-tagging in the search buffer for mail with

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:59:54 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > But: what does the "signed" tag mean? i wouldn't want to necessarily > conflate these four ideas: These are good points, Daniel. However, I had actually just been thinking of something much simpler, along the lines of just tagging

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:52:45 -0500, Ross Glover wrote: > I too am now running the crypto branch and find it quite amazing. The > one feature I would like added, though, is some face color or > auto-tagging in the search buffer for mail with encrypted mime parts. > It seems like this could be

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Ross Glover
I too am now running the crypto branch and find it quite amazing. The one feature I would like added, though, is some face color or auto-tagging in the search buffer for mail with encrypted mime parts. It seems like this could be achieved with notmuch effort (by someone notme) by adding similar

Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:41:48 +, Darren McGuicken mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote: If feedback is needed here then likewise, I've been running the crypto branch since it was made available. The only strangeness I've seen was that which was reported in

Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:59:54 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: But: what does the signed tag mean? i wouldn't want to necessarily conflate these four ideas: These are good points, Daniel. However, I had actually just been thinking of something much simpler, along the

Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Rob Browning
Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net writes: If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name. Are persistent tags required here?

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-27 Thread Darren McGuicken
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:45:15 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Further to our discussion on IRC the other day about providing > feedback on patches, I have run these patches pretty much all of > February with no glitches. I am running them on 3 different machines, > although they are all Debian

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-26 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch > repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed > and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied > on top of cworth's

[Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-26 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called crypto to my notmuch repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-05 Thread Darren McGuicken
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:32:23 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Yeah, I've found some emails that are doing this as well. I'm looking > in to what we can do to mitigate the problem, which I think is > ultimately a problem in GMime. The json output should not be > breaking, though, so that I will

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-05 Thread Darren McGuicken
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:32:23 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Yeah, I've found some emails that are doing this as well. I'm looking in to what we can do to mitigate the problem, which I think is ultimately a problem in GMime. The json output should not be breaking,

always encrypting messages to self [was: Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-02-04 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
I just love seeing all those yellow signatures. It reminds me to meet you all in real life to verify your keys :-). Thanks for implementing this, the whole lot of you. It works really well. Sebastian -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > > Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this > series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all > possible. I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with replies not working. It

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
Hey, folks. I've pushed some improvements to the "crypto" branch that: * add support for replying to encrypted messages * don't show sigstatus button for unsigned encrypted messages As always, please let me know encounter any problems. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/04/2011 11:59 AM, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >> when you say "encrypted by" do you mean "encrypted to"? do you have >> access to the corresponding secret key? > > If I open a message that was sent to me and was

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Darren McGuicken
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:41 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > > Can we pass the decrypted text to message mode on a reply? > Yeah, some folks pointed this out on #notmuch this morning. The > decryption is only happening in notmuch-show, but we need to do it in > notmuch-reply as well for the

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread micah anderson
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote: > > 1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to > > true > > note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on > an item in the summary

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:12:27 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with replies > not working. It turns out they were caused by having old versions of > xapian installed in /usr/local (which I think might have caused some > mixup with headers and

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:09:48 +, Darren McGuicken wrote: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:41 -0800, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > > Can we pass the decrypted text to message mode on a reply? > > Yeah, some folks pointed this out on #notmuch this morning. The > > decryption is only

always encrypting messages to self [was: Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:04:23 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > I just love seeing all those yellow signatures. It reminds me to meet > you all in real life to verify your keys :-). > > Thanks for implementing this, the whole lot of you. It works really > well. Yes! I'm really glad you're

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:24:38 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch > > repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed > > and

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch > repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed > and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied > on top of cworth's

Re: always encrypting messages to self [was: Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-02-04 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
I just love seeing all those yellow signatures. It reminds me to meet you all in real life to verify your keys :-). Thanks for implementing this, the whole lot of you. It works really well. Sebastian pgpuhM09gqBWa.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread micah anderson
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote: 1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to true note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on an item

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all possible. I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:24:38 -0400, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called crypto to my notmuch repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME

Re: always encrypting messages to self [was: Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:04:23 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: I just love seeing all those yellow signatures. It reminds me to meet you all in real life to verify your keys :-). Thanks for implementing this, the whole lot of you. It works really well. Yes! I'm really

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/04/2011 11:59 AM, micah anderson wrote: On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: when you say encrypted by do you mean encrypted to? do you have access to the corresponding secret key? If I open a message that was sent to me and was

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:09:48 +, Darren McGuicken mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote: On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:41 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Can we pass the decrypted text to message mode on a reply? Yeah, some folks pointed this out on #notmuch this

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:12:27 -0400, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with replies not working. It turns out they were caused by having old versions of xapian installed in /usr/local (which I think might have caused some mixup with

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Darren McGuicken
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this > series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all > possible. Fan. Tastic. Thanks so much for this, incredible work! Grabbed and testing now, the

always encrypting messages to self [was: Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/03/2011 03:34 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >> You either want to fix this in your emacs config by putting your >> fingerprint into mml2015-signers and setting mml2015-encrypt-to-self >> >> Or you want to set

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Micah-- just wanted to follow up on your points/questions: On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote: > 1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to > true note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on an item in the summary window to have

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:42:38 +, Darren McGuicken wrote: > On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this > > series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all > > possible. >

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/02/2011 08:18 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch > repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed > and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. I have tested this, and am now using it. I'm very

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote: > > 1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to > > true > > note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on > an item in the summary

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread micah anderson
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch > repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed > and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied > on top of cworth's

new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Jameson Rollins
Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called crypto to my notmuch repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied on top of cworth's current master (21e97c50). It includes the following: * David

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/02/2011 08:18 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called crypto to my notmuch repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. I have tested this, and am now using it. I'm very happy

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Micah-- just wanted to follow up on your points/questions: On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote: 1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to true note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on an item in the summary window to have

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Darren McGuicken
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all possible. Fan. Tastic. Thanks so much for this, incredible work! Grabbed

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-03 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:42:38 +, Darren McGuicken mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this series merged into the mainline for the next

always encrypting messages to self [was: Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support]

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/03/2011 03:34 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: You either want to fix this in your emacs config by putting your fingerprint into mml2015-signers and setting mml2015-encrypt-to-self Or you want to set gpg's

new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-02 Thread Jameson Rollins
Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied on top of cworth's current master (21e97c50). It includes the following: * David