notmuch-next branch

2010-10-13 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
> I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too. > > I suppose I should just set that up... +1 which would make it easier to find for new users. Who would have push rights? (not me). Sebastian

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-13 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too. I suppose I should just set that up... +1 which would make it easier to find for new users. Who would have push rights? (not me). Sebastian ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or > > gitorious (please vote). > > I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or > gitorious (please vote). I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too. I suppose I should just set that up... -Carl -- nex

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-10-11, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > I don't know how official this has to be -- just an agreed upon branch > that people keep around next to their own personal one. Sebastian used > to have one that served this purpose a while back, I think. Well, it wasn't really semi-official or even

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote: >> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So >> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or >>

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-10-11, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: I don't know how official this has to be -- just an agreed upon branch that people keep around next to their own personal one. Sebastian used to have one that served this purpose a while back, I think. Well, it wasn't really semi-official or even blessed,

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too. I suppose I should just set that up... -Carl

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). I'd be glad to host something

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote: >> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So >> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or >>

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Jed Brown
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:00, Jameson Rollins wrote: > As long as all the repos are synced, then you only need to track one. > But notmuch already has "official" repos [0], and making another > pseudo-"official" repo will probably just makes things more confusing. Patches show up in a different

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). More than one person should have write access to this repo, but some guidelines should be in place. I propose that patches should

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Kristoffer Ström
> What do you think? Good idea. github+

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:10:24 +0200, Jed Brown wrote: > Patches show up in a different order in each person's "personal, but > 'synced'" repository. Then you need a mess of merges to actually get > them synced (if they are published, you can't rebase). I'd add, by way of voting for something a

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:40:52 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote: > While distributed development is good, it would be nice for users to > be able to clone one git repo instead of tracking 5 different trees. > And more users typically means more robust software. As long as all the repos are synced, then

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or > gitorious (please vote). > > More than one person should have write access to this

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Servilio Afre Puentes
On 11 October 2010 14:45, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hi, > > I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or > gitorious (please vote). +1 for gitorious, you can use OpenID and their code is av

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). More than one person should have write access to this repo, but some guidelines should be in place. I propose that patches should

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Servilio Afre Puentes
On 11 October 2010 14:45, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). +1 for gitorious, you can use OpenID and their code

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). More than one person should have write access

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Servilio Afre Puentes
On 11 October 2010 15:01, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Jed Brown
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:00, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: As long as all the repos are synced, then you only need to track one. But notmuch already has official repos [0], and making another pseudo-official repo will probably just makes things more confusing. Patches

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-11 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either