On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:32:30 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Also, if anyone has any suggestions for things that we could do to
> improve things if I have to "disappear" again in the future, then I
> would be happy to do what I can.
Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:12 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some
> lieutenants to handle processing patches. There definitely are some
> worthy candidates (who are kind of already doing this already). Even if
> they're not
epository has been almost entirely stagnant for the last
several months. That was due to me not finding the chance to do notmuch
development on a regular basis for some months.
Fortunately, I've just recently (in the past week) started doing
development again, and I'm optimistic that I'll be abl
It seems to me that development on notmuch has slowed down recently? Lots
of patches sitting in the patch queue and not much movement on the git
repository? Am I missing where the development is going on?
--
Scott Henson
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was
It seems to me that development on notmuch has slowed down recently? Lots
of patches sitting in the patch queue and not much movement on the git
repository? Am I missing where the development is going on?
--
Scott Henson
___
notmuch mailing list
. The git repository has been almost entirely stagnant for the last
several months. That was due to me not finding the chance to do notmuch
development on a regular basis for some months.
Fortunately, I've just recently (in the past week) started doing
development again, and I'm optimistic that I'll
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:32:30 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Also, if anyone has any suggestions for things that we could do to
improve things if I have to disappear again in the future, then I
would be happy to do what I can.
Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:12 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some
lieutenants to handle processing patches. There definitely are some
worthy candidates (who are kind of already doing this already). Even
