Hi everyone :)
the patchwork instance referenced on notmuchmail.org [0] returns a
404 not found.
Cheers,
Justus
0: http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org/project/notmuch
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: .signature
Type: application/octet-stream
Size
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:46:58 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm not sure, maybe Martin retired the patchwork instance. I know that
> neither Carl nor I used it.
id:"20110630090114.GA10571 at albatross.gern.madduck.net"
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:09:50 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at
informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> the patchwork instance referenced on notmuchmail.org [0] returns a
> 404 not found.
>
I'm not sure, maybe Martin retired the patchwork instance. I know that
neith
Hi everyone :)
the patchwork instance referenced on notmuchmail.org [0] returns a
404 not found.
Cheers,
Justus
0: http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org/project/notmuch
.signature
Description: Binary data
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:09:50 +0100, Justus Winter
4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
the patchwork instance referenced on notmuchmail.org [0] returns a
404 not found.
I'm not sure, maybe Martin retired the patchwork instance. I know that
neither Carl nor I used it.
If that turns out
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:46:58 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
I'm not sure, maybe Martin retired the patchwork instance. I know that
neither Carl nor I used it.
id:20110630090114.ga10...@albatross.gern.madduck.net
___
notmuch mailing list
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:01:14 +0200, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
Are people using http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org at all? The reason
of my asking is that it receives quite a lot of spam and I do not
need to invest this time for a service noone uses.
I have not been using it. I
Are people using http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org at all? The reason
of my asking is that it receives quite a lot of spam and I do not
need to invest this time for a service noone uses.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"'oh, that was easy,' says Man, and for an encore
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:01:14 +0200, martin f krafft
wrote:
> Are people using http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org at all? The reason
> of my asking is that it receives quite a lot of spam and I do not
> need to invest this time for a service noone uses.
I have not been using it. I dos appreciate
Are people using http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org at all? The reason
of my asking is that it receives quite a lot of spam and I do not
need to invest this time for a service noone uses.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
'oh, that was easy,' says Man, and for an encore
ted and removed from the list. Is that successfully
> happening now?
Yes, I've automatically tagged approx. 140 patches "accepted" so
far.
> In the meantime, if someone does want to push some buttons in
> patchwork, nothing before 2009-12-01 at least is interesting.
Okay, all
also sprach Carl Worth [2010.02.24.2010 +0100]:
> > Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like
> > patchwork+rejected at patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it
> > trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically.
>
> Now you're tal
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:22:16 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like
> patchwork+rejected at patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it
> trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically.
Now you're talking my
If so, I'd be happy to regularly post the results of my
notmuch todo list, which, by the way, is currently:
notmuch search tag:todo-notmuch or (tag:notmuch and (tag:todo or tag:inbox))
In the meantime, if someone does want to push some buttons in patchwork,
nothing before 2009-12-01 at least is in
also sprach Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org [2010.02.24.2010 +0100]:
Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like
patchwork+rejec...@patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it
trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically.
Now you're talking my language
ccessible somewhere, this would be
> super useful. At least it would help me see whether Carl just hasn't
> gotten around to including my "press 'd' for delete" patch or whether he
> is not interested in merging it. :)
Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses li
also sprach David Bremner [2010.02.10.2149 +1300]:
> I'm not sure what merging patches means here; some kind of squash
> operation? Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series
> that I looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am
> just unlucky, or does patc
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.02.02.1131 +1300]:
> I investigated some patch/issue trackers over the weekend. Here's my
> summary/reply.
>
> The executive summary is that
> http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
> I have not really used it for anything real, so if
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> > http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
>
> Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is
> impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep
> around, or should I take the
s means here; some kind of squash
operation? Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series that I
looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am just unlucky,
or does patchwork really not understand the concept of series of patches
in a thread?
d
means here; some kind of squash
operation? Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series that I
looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am just unlucky,
or does patchwork really not understand the concept of series of patches
in a thread?
d
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is
impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep
around, or should I
also sprach David Bremner brem...@unb.ca [2010.02.10.2149 +1300]:
I'm not sure what merging patches means here; some kind of squash
operation? Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series
that I looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am
just unlucky, or does patchwork
also sprach martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net [2010.02.02.1131 +1300]:
I investigated some patch/issue trackers over the weekend. Here's my
summary/reply.
The executive summary is that
http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
I have not really used it for anything
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.02.04.1650 +1300]:
> - ? which brings me to my second point: there are certain things
> that patchwork can do, at least in theory:
>
> * mark patches accepted when they hit your (canonical) master
> branch
> * mark patches rfc whe
also sprach martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net [2010.02.04.1650 +1300]:
- … which brings me to my second point: there are certain things
that patchwork can do, at least in theory:
* mark patches accepted when they hit your (canonical) master
branch
* mark patches rfc when
ppens on Git is that you either write it yourself and bring
> it up to discussion (which is what patchwork facilitates), or
> constructively theorise the functionality until someone else
> submits a patch.
And don't forget, if you really want something on the longterm todo
list, you can a
! Feedback
welcome.
also sprach James Rowe [2010.01.28.2005 +1300]:
> Roundup has command line and email interfaces. The email interface is
> quite similar to debian's. I've never used a launchpad hosted project
> so I can't compare it.
Roundup is an issue tracker, while Patchwork i
! Feedback
welcome.
also sprach James Rowe jnr...@gmail.com [2010.01.28.2005 +1300]:
Roundup has command line and email interfaces. The email interface is
quite similar to debian's. I've never used a launchpad hosted project
so I can't compare it.
Roundup is an issue tracker, while Patchwork
29 matches
Mail list logo
