On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
> > within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
> >
I have tagged and pushed
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> >
> > I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
> > within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
> >
I have tagged and pushed 0.1
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> >
> > Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any
> > test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?
> > (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> >
> > Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any
> > test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?
> > (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
> within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
>
> If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free
> to follow up. The m
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any
> test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?
> (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions)
>
Hi Pieter;
My initial answer is probably
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any
> test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?
> (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions)
>
Hi Pieter;
My initial answer is probably
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
> within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
>
> If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free
> to follow up. The m
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> It has also been some chatter that either (the next iteration of)
>
>id:"1329296619-7463-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com"
>
> Should go in, or we should revert amdragon's exclude stuff.
>
> I don't have strong feelings
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> It has also been some chatter that either (the next iteration of)
>
>id:"1329296619-7463-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com"
>
> Should go in, or we should revert amdragon's exclude stuff.
>
> I don't have strong feelin
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
> within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
>
> If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free
> to follow up. The m
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
> within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
>
> If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free
> to follow up. The m
I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free
to follow up. The main point here is bug fixes, or features which are
there in a kindof h
I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free
to follow up. The main point here is bug fixes, or features which are
there in a kindof h
14 matches
Mail list logo
