[python] documentation & TODO list

2011-12-06 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:36:06 +, Patrick Totzke wrote: > These are the things I noticed when going through the code today: > 1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be >'\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object >behave as

Re: [python] documentation TODO list

2011-12-06 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:36:06 +, Patrick Totzke wrote: These are the things I noticed when going through the code today: 1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be '\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object behave as iterator.

[python] documentation & TODO list

2011-12-05 Thread Patrick Totzke
Hi! This is mainly directed towards Sebastian, but a broader audience can't hurt. These are the things I noticed when going through the code today: 1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be '\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object

[python] documentation TODO list

2011-12-05 Thread Patrick Totzke
Hi! This is mainly directed towards Sebastian, but a broader audience can't hurt. These are the things I noticed when going through the code today: 1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be '\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object

python documentation

2011-04-19 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain > wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? > I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to > get a

python documentation

2011-04-19 Thread Aaron Williamson
On 04/19/2011 04:01 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf > wrote: >> Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain >> wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? >> I don't want to imply that this

Re: python documentation

2011-04-19 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to

Re: python documentation

2011-04-19 Thread Aaron Williamson
On 04/19/2011 04:01 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? I don't want to imply

python documentation

2011-04-18 Thread Florian Friesdorf
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:57:26 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Friesdorf > wrote: > > I think it is confusing that it has a different versioning than notmuch > > itself and that it would be more intuitive if the current bindings on > > pypi [1] would

python documentation

2011-04-18 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ > I updated http://notmuchmail.org/howto/ to point to notmuch instead of > cnotmuch, but I cannot tell whether the

python documentation

2011-04-18 Thread Florian Friesdorf
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote: > > I just discovered this: > > > > http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ > > > > I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer. > > I prefer the

Re: python documentation

2011-04-18 Thread Florian Friesdorf
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote: I just discovered this: http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer. I prefer

Re: python documentation

2011-04-18 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ I updated http://notmuchmail.org/howto/ to point to notmuch instead of cnotmuch, but I cannot

python documentation

2011-03-16 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:01:15 -0400, James Vasile wrote: > Yep, just a completed TODO. Patch below. Fixed and pushed. Thanks. Sebastian -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not

Re: python documentation

2011-03-16 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:01:15 -0400, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: Yep, just a completed TODO. Patch below. Fixed and pushed. Thanks. Sebastian pgpNYkRfIXRj1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list

python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote: > I just discovered this: > > http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ > > I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer. I prefer the stronger type of beer. But I'll even take Budweiser :-). Please ship in August to

python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:33:19 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile > wrote: > > notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it > > appears to work already. What's missing? > > Hey, James. Is this related t

python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it appears to work already. What's missing? Thanks, James

python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile wrote: > notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it > appears to work already. What's missing? Hey, James. Is this related to the python documentation somehow? If so, I'm not sure how. If you're just referencing

python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread Jameson Rollins
I just discovered this: http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not

Re: python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote: I just discovered this: http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer. I prefer the stronger type of beer. But I'll even take Budweiser :-). Please ship in August to San

Re: python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement dump filename' but it appears to work already. What's missing? Thanks, James ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Re: python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement dump filename' but it appears to work already. What's missing? Hey, James. Is this related to the python documentation somehow? If so, I'm not sure how. If you're just

Re: python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
. Is this related to the python documentation somehow? If so, I'm not sure how. If you're just referencing a completed TODO, you could definitely submit a patch to remove it from the TODO. Yep, just a completed TODO. Patch below. diff --git a/bindings/python/notmuch.py b/bindings/python