> Want to replay all the git test-suite commits other than any from the
> person with the missing ack? That should get us pretty close to the
> current state in git, would give us code we could use, and might even
> make it possible for us to submit improvements directly to the upstream
> git
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:59:12 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > Want to replay all the git test-suite commits other than any from the
> > person with the missing ack?
>
> I do not fully understand what you propose here. You mean to reply the
> commits from git repository into notmuch repository and
Want to replay all the git test-suite commits other than any from the
person with the missing ack? That should get us pretty close to the
current state in git, would give us code we could use, and might even
make it possible for us to submit improvements directly to the upstream
git
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:59:12 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
Want to replay all the git test-suite commits other than any from the
person with the missing ack?
I do not fully understand what you propose here. You mean to reply the
commits from git repository into notmuch
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Ohh, that is a good point. Maybe I should write some :-). Is the test
> suite going to be changed any day now or does it still make sense to
> write tests for the "monolitic" test suite?
I do not have a plan to modularize the test suite in a near
On 2010-04-22, Carl Worth wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> >
> > jkr and I noticed that patch series are shown in reverse order now, in
> > fact threads seem to display messages at the same depth in reverse
> > chronological order now.
>
> My fault! Sorry about that.
No harm
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:15:22 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> > Ohh, that is a good point. Maybe I should write some :-). Is the test
> > suite going to be changed any day now or does it still make sense to
> > write tests for the "monolitic" test suite?
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Ohh, that is a good point. Maybe I should write some :-). Is the test
suite going to be changed any day now or does it still make sense to
write tests for the monolitic test suite?
I do not have a plan to modularize the test suite in a near future.
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:15:22 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Ohh, that is a good point. Maybe I should write some :-). Is the test
suite going to be changed any day now or does it still make sense to
write tests for the monolitic
jkr and I noticed that patch series are shown in reverse order now, in
fact threads seem to display messages at the same depth in reverse
chronological order now.
Here is my monologue from IRC:
Is that supposed to show the whole thread in reverse chronological order?:
notmuch show
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:06:27 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
>
> jkr and I noticed that patch series are shown in reverse order now, in
> fact threads seem to display messages at the same depth in reverse
> chronological order now.
My fault! Sorry about that.
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:14:16
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:21:11 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> My suggestion would be to revert both the simplification and the fix to
> enable the simplification to pass: (36e4459a3, 2a1a4f0551).
Sorry, got that slightly wrong. The following commits need to be
reverted:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:14:16 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> Just to follow up on this, it seems that the regression comes from the
> fix Carl introduced in 2a1a4f0551 to make his simplification of my patch
> (simplification = 36e4459a3 , my patch = 4971b85641) pass tests. The
> question is
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:06:27 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
>
> jkr and I noticed that patch series are shown in reverse order now, in
> fact threads seem to display messages at the same depth in reverse
> chronological order now.
Just to follow up on this, it seems that the regression comes
jkr and I noticed that patch series are shown in reverse order now, in
fact threads seem to display messages at the same depth in reverse
chronological order now.
Here is my monologue from IRC:
Is that supposed to show the whole thread in reverse chronological order?:
notmuch show
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:06:27 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
jkr and I noticed that patch series are shown in reverse order now, in
fact threads seem to display messages at the same depth in reverse
chronological order now.
Just to follow up on this, it seems that the
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:14:16 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
Just to follow up on this, it seems that the regression comes from the
fix Carl introduced in 2a1a4f0551 to make his simplification of my patch
(simplification = 36e4459a3 , my patch = 4971b85641) pass tests. The
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:21:11 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
My suggestion would be to revert both the simplification and the fix to
enable the simplification to pass: (36e4459a3, 2a1a4f0551).
Sorry, got that slightly wrong. The following commits need to be
reverted:
18 matches
Mail list logo
