David Bremner writes:
> I was feeling a bit annoyed at the idea of patching the notmuch test
> framework so that C99 was used by default [1], so I bumped the travis
> build env to xenial. trusty (the previous config) is EOL in April.
>
> Unfortunately it looks like xenial is also too old to have
Brian May writes:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> Those of you about to tell me how much better FreedomAvocadoCI [2] is
>> [2]: Not (yet) a real product/project.
>
> I don't know of any existing solution that actually advocates freedom
> :-(
There is for instance GitLab CI, although their "main" p
On Wed, Mar 06 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> Those of you about to tell me how much better FreedomAvocadoCI [2] is
> than Travis are encouraged to set up instances and we can try it out. As
> long as Carl doesn't object, I would be interested in a setup where we
> run e.g. webhooks directly on git.n
I was feeling a bit annoyed at the idea of patching the notmuch test
framework so that C99 was used by default [1], so I bumped the travis
build env to xenial. trusty (the previous config) is EOL in April.
Unfortunately it looks like xenial is also too old to have gmime-3.0, so
we're still testin
