tweaks for handling parts in reply
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:30:05 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" > lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. I have applied this series on top of master, and will push a bit later today. d
Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:29:52 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > I have applied this series on top of master, and will push a bit later today. Great. Thanks so much, David. jamie. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
tweaks for handling parts in reply
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:29:52 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > I have applied this series on top of master, and will push a bit later today. Great. Thanks so much, David. jamie.
Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:30:05 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" > lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. I have applied this series on top of master, and will push a bit later today. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
tweaks for handling parts in reply
It's too bad this requires lots of special-casing. I dug into mutt, hoping to find some simpler way to choose what to reply to, but all I found was a far more complicated collection of heuristics (see mutt_body_handler if you're interested). Should reply *ever* include a "Non-text part" message? It certainly doesn't help the receiver of the reply and presumably the sender will either notice that a part is missing if they care about it, or probably miss the Non-text part message anyway if they don't. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" > lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. > > This patch set is not really related to the series that it is being > sent in reply to, but it has been worked on top of the message/rfc822 > rework of the multipart test, so it's being sent in reply to that > message. > > jamie. > > ___ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch at notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch >
Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply
It's too bad this requires lots of special-casing. I dug into mutt, hoping to find some simpler way to choose what to reply to, but all I found was a far more complicated collection of heuristics (see mutt_body_handler if you're interested). Should reply *ever* include a "Non-text part" message? It certainly doesn't help the receiver of the reply and presumably the sender will either notice that a part is missing if they care about it, or probably miss the Non-text part message anyway if they don't. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" > lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. > > This patch set is not really related to the series that it is being > sent in reply to, but it has been worked on top of the message/rfc822 > rework of the multipart test, so it's being sent in reply to that > message. > > jamie. > > ___ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch > ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
tweaks for handling parts in reply
This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. This patch set is not really related to the series that it is being sent in reply to, but it has been worked on top of the message/rfc822 rework of the multipart test, so it's being sent in reply to that message. jamie. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
tweaks for handling parts in reply
This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. This patch set is not really related to the series that it is being sent in reply to, but it has been worked on top of the message/rfc822 rework of the multipart test, so it's being sent in reply to that message. jamie.
