On Mon, Mar 06 2017, Steven Allen wrote:
> Instead of iterating over all messages in spam, why not just iterate
> over *new* messages (`tag:new`) in your pre hook? That is (pseudo code):
>
> for message in `notmuch search tag:new and tag:spam`:
> for author in message.headers["From"]:
On Mon, Mar 06 2017, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I could try to write a python script to iterate over all tag:spam,
> extract addresses from those messages, and match against the
> whitelist, but I doubt that will be any faster.
So a custom python script that iterates over all tag:new messages
Jameson,
> This works ok, but takes more than 20s to execute, which will slow down
> my inbox processing quite a bit. I could try to write a python script
> to iterate over all tag:spam, extract addresses from those messages, and
> match against the whitelist, but I doubt that will be any faster
Hi, folks. In my on-going war with spam [0], the new battle ground is
false positives: I'm losing too much ham to mis-classification.
For my first line of attack, I would like automatically whitelist every
address to which I have ever sent mail. I realize this is flawed
(spammers frequently pose
