[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] notmuch-reply.c: factor adding recipients into common function

2009-11-29 Thread Jed Brown
add_recipients_from_message, in order to isolate more sophisticated mailing list logic. Signed-off-by: Jed Brown --- notmuch-reply.c | 88 --- 1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch-reply.c: Handle munged `Reply-To' headers.

2009-11-29 Thread Jed Brown
Some mailing lists engage in the evil practice of changing the Reply-To header so that replies from all mailers go to the list by default, at the expense of not responding to the person who actually sent the message. When this is detected, we reply to `From' and remove the duplicate response to

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/3] add checking for zlib development libraries to configure script

2009-11-29 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
ot.com/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 834 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091129/7dd788c7/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/3] add checking for zlib development libraries to configure script

2009-11-29 Thread da...@tethera.net
Mikhail Gusarov wrote: >Twas brillig at 18:57:36 28.11.2009 UTC-05 when jrollins at finestructure.net >did gyre and gimble: > JGR> + sudo apt-get install libxapian-dev libgmime-2.4-dev > JGR> libtalloc-dev libz-dev >Proper fix is to fix libgmime-2.4.pc upstream to stop exposing -lz This is

[notmuch] [PATCH v3] Add the beginnings of a test suite.

2009-11-29 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
Digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091129/14de9c57/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH v3] Add the beginnings of a test suite.

2009-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 03:33:14PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: >> Run "make check" from the toplevel directory to build and run the >> checks. > > I think it's usually standard to call the tests with "make test", yes? > Is there a

[notmuch] Debian packaging

2009-11-29 Thread David Bremner
Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: >Please let me know if there are any questions, comments, patches, etc. >jamie. >[0] I noticed that David Bremner filled a RFP for notmuch a little >while ago: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557354 I should have mentioned on the RFP, but I have

[notmuch] Debian packaging

2009-11-29 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 08:55 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > As much as I would love to, at this point I'm not quite offering to > actually be maintainer of a notmuch Debian package. Actually, since Carl is a DD now, I've already nudged him about maintaining a Debian package, and offered

[notmuch] Debian packaging

2009-11-29 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
nt was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091129/ff4d4ea6/attachment-0001.pgp>

[notmuch] OpenPGP support

2009-11-29 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
rs for the list that would be great. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091129/a5f8ae07/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] Debian packaging

2009-11-29 Thread da...@tethera.net
Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: >I'm happy to combine efforts. Seems to me the most appropriate thing >to do, since we're already working in git, is to track each others >"debian" branches. Is this the canonical URL of your repo?: >http://pivot.cs.unb.ca/git/notmuch.git That should work, but