Re: [notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 07:09 AM, Carl Worth wrote: Your original patch was sent as application/octet-stream which made it awkward to read, (I would have to manually save it rather than just being able to read it within emacs with notmuch). uum yeah thanks. I'll try to figure out how this works. But

Re: [notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 03:29 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote: done I'm still not sure what is slow for you, scanning 60k mails. :D That's not fixable, other then by not doing that. but I'm also not sure how the above would help. It doesn't scan all 60K individually but only the single new one.

[notmuch] Git feature branch

2010-01-23 Thread Carl Worth
not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100123/39f2fd5b/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH] Build and link against notmuch shared library

2010-01-23 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Ben Gamari wrote: > ?libnotmuch_modules = $(libnotmuch_c_srcs:.c=.o) $(libnotmuch_cxx_srcs:.cc=.o) > -$(dir)/notmuch.a: $(libnotmuch_modules) > - ? ? ? $(call quiet,AR) rcs $@ $^ > +$(dir)/$(SONAME): $(libnotmuch_modules) > + ? ? ? $(call quiet,CXX,$(LDFLAGS)) $^

[notmuch] [PATCH] Build and link against notmuch shared library

2010-01-23 Thread Ingmar Vanhassel
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:58:53 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Ben Gamari > wrote: > > ??libnotmuch_modules = $(libnotmuch_c_srcs:.c=.o) > > $(libnotmuch_cxx_srcs:.cc=.o) > > -$(dir)/notmuch.a: $(libnotmuch_modules) > > - ?? ?? ?? $(call quiet,AR) rcs $@ $^ > >

[notmuch] [PATCH] d_type fix

2010-01-23 Thread Carl Worth
using "git format-patch" and "git send-email" to send it). But I'll go ahead and make one up. Thanks again! -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100123/8c0929c8/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] Bug with commit 2e96464f9705be4ec772280cad71a6c9d5831e6f

2010-01-23 Thread Carl Worth
happens to get done during this vacation. :-) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100123/2bda3205/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Carl Worth
-- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100123/7c3edd17/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:09:35 +1300, Carl Worth wrote: > But I've since pushed a separate patch to fix this bug. Please give it a > try and let me know what you think. I just gave it a try, and building failed because of a seeming misspelling on line 285 (`DT_UKNOWN'), from commit

[notmuch] Bug with commit 2e96464f9705be4ec772280cad71a6c9d5831e6f

2010-01-23 Thread ra...@free.fr
not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100123/4ff1e96b/attachment.obj>

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Carl Worth
ature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100123/4af96b4d/attachment-0001.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH -V2 1/2] notmuch-reply: Add support for replying only to sender

2010-01-23 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V This patch add --format=sender-only option. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- notmuch-reply.c | 54 -- 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c

[notmuch] [PATCH -V2 2/2] notmuch.el: Add support for reply-to sender

2010-01-23 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V Add key binding to do a reply-to sender. This is mapped to 'R' Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- notmuch.el | 24 ++-- 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index

[notmuch] [PATCH -V2] notmuch.el: Support for customizing search result display

2010-01-23 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V This patch helps in customizing search result display similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done by defining an alist as below (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ") ("authors" .

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 07:09 AM, Carl Worth wrote: > Your original patch was sent as "application/octet-stream" which made it > awkward to read, (I would have to manually save it rather than just > being able to read it within emacs with notmuch). uum yeah thanks. I'll try to figure out how this works.

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 03:29 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote: >>> done >> >> I'm still not sure what is slow for you, > > scanning 60k mails. :D That's not fixable, other then by not doing that. > > but I'm also not sure how the above would help. > > It doesn't scan all 60K individually but only the single new

[notmuch] [PATCH] Build and link against notmuch shared library

2010-01-23 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from Felipe Contreras's message of Fri Jan 22 19:58:53 -0500 2010: > Does it need to be CXX? Why not CC instead? > Nope. It's been changed to CC. Thanks! - Ben

[notmuch] [PATCH] Build and link against notmuch shared library

2010-01-23 Thread bgamari.foss
Excerpts from Ingmar Vanhassel's message of Fri Jan 22 21:06:00 -0500 2010: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:58:53 +0200, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote: > > Does it need to be CXX? Why not CC instead? > > Xapian and the notmuch wrapper 'parts' are written in C++. > True, but I don't think that this