[notmuch] date parser branch updated and rebased

In order to not let this bitrot, I just rebased my dateparser branch to current cworth master and split up the patches in a nicer way. I made sure that every commit compiles. Let me know if there are things that should be handled in a different way. find the git branch here:

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/4] Introduce new notmuch return status NOTMUCH_STATUS_INVALID_DATE

This is not used yet in this commit but will be the return value in case the date parser gets handed invalid dates. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de --- lib/database.cc |2 ++ lib/notmuch.h |3 +++ notmuch-new.c |1 + 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/4] integrate date parser

Integrate and make use of the notmuch_parse_date() function in date.c that is being called by the new MaildateValueRangeProcessor in lib/database.cc Thanks to keithp for donating the date parser for achieving this in a nice way. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de ---

[notmuch] [PATCH 4/4] add documentation for the new daterange parser and remove TODO list item

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de --- TODO |9 - notmuch.1 | 29 - notmuch.c | 24 +--- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index bdfe64c..86cbf74 100644 --- a/TODO +++

Re: [notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

On Saturday 06 of February 2010 22:45:32 Carl Worth wrote: On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: It is straightforward to convert your current test script to Git's framework. If you are interested I'll do it. Yes, I'd be quite interested in seeing that.

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

On Thursday 04 of February 2010 21:50:18 Carl Worth wrote: The test suite is still extremely rudimentary. Here are some things I'd like to improve about it: I converted the actual version of notmuch-test to git test framework. The result is in the followup patches. I'd like to know opinion of

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/3] Copy test framework from Git

Git uses a simple and yet powerfull test framework, written in shell. The framework is easy to use for both users and developers so I thing it would help if it is used in notmuch as well. This is a copy of Git's test framework from commit b8bba419250711a69e09e7648e5c991f4847a127. Signed-off-by:

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] Convert the actual tests to the new framework

The changes are: - The notmuch-test was split into several files (t000?-*.sh). - Removed helper functions which were moved to test-lib.sh - Replaced every printf with test_expect_success. - Replaced $NOTMUCH with notmuch (test-lib.sh sets $PATH appropriately) - Test commands chained with

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/3] Update test framework for use with notmuch

This removes Git specific things from the test-lib.sh and adds helper functions for notmuch taken from Carl's notmuch-test script. README is also slightly modified to reflect the current state. Signed-off-by: Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz --- test/Makefile |1 + test/README

Re: [notmuch] strange behavior of indexing of and searching for strings containing '[]'

On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:48:03 + (UTC), Olly Betts o...@survex.com wrote: On 2010-02-05, Jameson Rollins wrote: Hey, folks. I've been noticing some strange behavior of notmuch search results for strings containing '[]'. Here are some searches for some exact strings in messages subjects:

[notmuch] [PATCH] Switch from random to sequential thread identifiers.

The sequential identifiers have the advantage of being guaranteed to be unique (until we overflow a 64-bit unsigned integer), and also take up slightly less space in the notmuch search output (20 columns rather than 32). This change also has the side effect of fixing a bug where notmuch could

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Switch from random to sequential thread identifiers.

The sequential identifiers have the advantage of being guaranteed to be unique (until we overflow a 64-bit unsigned integer), and also take up half as much space in the notmuch search output (16 columns rather than 32). This change also has the side effect of fixing a bug where notmuch could

Re: [notmuch] Update Patch Series. Only collapse part of citations.

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:09:06 -0400, da...@tethera.net wrote: On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:47:02 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen ka...@kanru.info wrote: I like this idea, but this patch hides all citations larger than the threshold. I'd like to see limited lines of citations been displayed. Since you

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 4/4] emacs: Use font-lock-comment-face to highlight citation button

On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:41:35 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen ka...@kanru.info wrote: [... no detailed commit message ...] I've pushed this change now. It looked to me like the previous changes in this series were made obsolete by the patches from David that I just pushed. Let me know if I'm wrong about that

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] Allow folders with no messages to be elided from list.

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:34:18 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: This makes it easier to see folders with messages. Eliding empty folders is togged with the 'e' binding. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com Thanks for the patches, Keith! These are all very useful, and

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Goto-Address mode hides the body toggle button on messages of zero depth.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:47:45 +0100, Pablo Oliveira pa...@sifflez.org wrote: Hello all, Olá Pablo! Bem-vindo a notmuch! I heard about notmuch some weeks ago and I'm already liking it a lot. At first I was a little disapointed by the slow tagging, but that was fixed by Kan-Ru's great patch

Re: [notmuch] notmuch.el and searching within citations

On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:18:10 +1100, Bart Bunting b...@ursys.com.au wrote: Hi all, Hi Bart, welcome to notmuch! If however the word 'grandfather' appears in a citation then an incremental search through the buffer won't find it. If the citation is expanded then things work as expected. I

[notmuch] date parser branch updated and rebased

In order to not let this bitrot, I just rebased my dateparser branch to current cworth master and split up the patches in a nicer way. I made sure that every commit compiles. Let me know if there are things that should be handled in a different way. find the git branch here:

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/4] add date parser file from Keith

From: Keith Packard Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of date formats, including things like "today", "thisweek", ISO and US date formats and month names. You can separate two dates with .. to make a range, or you can just use the default

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/4] Introduce new notmuch return status NOTMUCH_STATUS_INVALID_DATE

This is not used yet in this commit but will be the return value in case the date parser gets handed invalid dates. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth --- lib/database.cc |2 ++ lib/notmuch.h |3 +++ notmuch-new.c |1 + 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/4] integrate date parser

Integrate and make use of the notmuch_parse_date() function in date.c that is being called by the new MaildateValueRangeProcessor in lib/database.cc Thanks to keithp for donating the date parser for achieving this in a nice way. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth --- lib/Makefile.local |1 +

[notmuch] [PATCH 4/4] add documentation for the new daterange parser and remove TODO list item

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth --- TODO |9 - notmuch.1 | 29 - notmuch.c | 24 +--- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index bdfe64c..86cbf74 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -114,15

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-test: add tests for counting within absolute time ranges and 'today'

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth --- test/notmuch-test | 13 + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/notmuch-test b/test/notmuch-test index 2e5eb24..adc9f24 100755 --- a/test/notmuch-test +++ b/test/notmuch-test @@ -534,6 +534,19 @@ printf " Restore

[notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

On Saturday 06 of February 2010 22:45:32 Carl Worth wrote: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka > wrote: > > It is straightforward to convert your current test script to Git's > > framework. If you are interested I'll do it. > > Yes, I'd be quite interested in seeing that. Thanks

[notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

On Thursday 04 of February 2010 21:50:18 Carl Worth wrote: > The test suite is still extremely rudimentary. Here are some things I'd > like to improve about it: I converted the actual version of notmuch-test to git test framework. The result is in the followup patches. I'd like to know opinion

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/3] Copy test framework from Git

Git uses a simple and yet powerfull test framework, written in shell. The framework is easy to use for both users and developers so I thing it would help if it is used in notmuch as well. This is a copy of Git's test framework from commit b8bba419250711a69e09e7648e5c991f4847a127. Signed-off-by:

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] Convert the actual tests to the new framework

The changes are: - The notmuch-test was split into several files (t000?-*.sh). - Removed helper functions which were moved to test-lib.sh - Replaced every printf with test_expect_success. - Replaced $NOTMUCH with notmuch (test-lib.sh sets $PATH appropriately) - Test commands chained with &&

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/3] Update test framework for use with notmuch

This removes Git specific things from the test-lib.sh and adds helper functions for notmuch taken from Carl's notmuch-test script. README is also slightly modified to reflect the current state. Signed-off-by: Michal Sojka --- test/Makefile |1 + test/README | 12 +-

[notmuch] strange behavior of indexing of and searching for strings containing '[]'

-- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100208/a273d807/attachment-0001.pgp>

[notmuch] strange behavior of indexing of and searching for strings containing '[]'

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:24:06 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > I don't think that this is exactly correct. The quoting is interpreted > by the shell in order to construct a single string that is then passed > as an argument to the program. The command line distinguishes, but the constructed query

[notmuch] strange behavior of indexing of and searching for strings containing '[]'

It produces unexpected behavior with confusing results. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100208/5168e42c/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH] Switch from random to sequential thread identifiers.

The sequential identifiers have the advantage of being guaranteed to be unique (until we overflow a 64-bit unsigned integer), and also take up slightly less space in the "notmuch search" output (20 columns rather than 32). This change also has the side effect of fixing a bug where notmuch could

[notmuch] [PATCH] Switch from random to sequential thread identifiers.

The sequential identifiers have the advantage of being guaranteed to be unique (until we overflow a 64-bit unsigned integer), and also take up half as much space in the "notmuch search" output (16 columns rather than 32). This change also has the side effect of fixing a bug where notmuch could

[notmuch] Update Patch Series. Only collapse part of citations.

- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100208/ba86d6f2/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH 4/4] emacs: Use font-lock-comment-face to highlight citation button

anything more I should pick up from this series. -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100208/d8357

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] Allow folders with no messages to be elided from list.

(+), 5 deletions(-) ...except that on this last one I only pushed changes to notmuch.el. ;-) -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/piper

[notmuch] [PATCH] Goto-Address mode hides the body toggle button on messages of zero depth.

l name available? I think that might solve the problem for most people. -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100208/39ab6e5f/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] notmuch.el and searching within citations

Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100208/94bb5b2c/attachment.pgp>