Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Support for deletion (patch included)

2010-02-27 Thread racin
Here they are; as I don't know how to include them in the body, I put the patches as attachments. I hope this will be convienient enough for you. Matthieu - ra...@free.fr a écrit : Carl: The patch in the mail has problems; apparently I have to manually add scissorlines to the mail for

[notmuch] [PATCH] Support for deletion (patch included)

2010-02-27 Thread ra...@free.fr
xt part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0002-Add-support-for-deletion-in-the-emacs-interface.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 5934 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100227/548167d8/attachment.patch> -- next part

[notmuch] A few patches

2010-02-27 Thread David Edmondson
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:24:44 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > Then, I'd like to have a new, succinct and explicit syntax to indicate a > search that should return all results. For example, we could use '*' but > that has the issue that it would need escaping from the shell. But the > idea would be to

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-27 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:03:34 -0500, James Vasile wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson > wrote: > > > > Hey james, > > > > i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and > > integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are >

[notmuch] What's so great about notmuch?

2010-02-27 Thread martin f krafft
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100227/3d3dc69e/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] What's so great about notmuch?

2010-02-27 Thread ra...@free.fr
>What's your favorite thing about notmuch? The simple, functional emacs interface (rmail is too simple and Gnus too complex). Especially, I like the idea that many commands create new bufferes, that get deleted with "q", so that access to buffers is done like in a stack. >What about

[notmuch] [PATCH] compatibility with emacs22

2010-02-27 Thread James Vasile
Emacs22 lacks apply-partially and mouse-event-p, so define them if emacs version is less than 23. With this change, I was able to begin using notmuch in emacs22. apply-partially cribbed from http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2009/000889.html This is an updated patch that fixes a bug in

[notmuch] What's so great about notmuch?

2010-02-27 Thread James Westby
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:08:49 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > It seems clear that I'll have some opportunities to present notmuch to > various audiences at varying levels of formality. Since notmuch is > already a bigger project than me, I'd love to get some ideas from others > about what you think are