On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
commit e55dc251b9e8001fe16873fadac565563e606d69
Author: David Edmondson d...@dme.org
Date: Mon Apr 12 11:12:23 2010 +0100
emacs: Add notmuch-hello.el, a friendly frontend to notmuch
Hi dme,
thanks for the great patch. For next time, could
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:25:43 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
For next time, could you plese use 'git format-patch' for generating
patches for sending in email? If I pipe your message to 'git am', all
the above text becomes a part of commit message.
Will do.
dme.
--
David
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:59:24 +1000, Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 14:10, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
+/* the semantic here actually puzzles me:
+ how can haystack be const char * - yet the return value is char *
+ after all, it points to
The current hardcoded behaviour will not take you to the next unread
thread when the sort order is set to newer-first from the default of
older-first.
Signed-off-by: Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com
---
emacs/notmuch.el |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
Signed-off-by: Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index 517c53a..4d4971f 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch.el
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ For a
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:27:57 -0500, James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net
wrote:
This allows us to thread messages even when we receive them out of
order, or never receive the root.
Thanks for this patch, James! It's especially nice to have the fix come
in with additions to the test suite as
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:23:23 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
When Ctrl-C is pressed in a wrong time during notmuch new, it can lead
to removal of messages from the database even if the files were not
removed.
It happened at least once to me.
Signed-off-by: Michal Sojka
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:47:00 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
First of all, thanks for the great work Carl. I have to admit I was
getting nervous about the backlog of patches, but your recent committing
binge (you did say your work patterns are bursty :-)) made me very
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:21 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I would really like to see the patch in spaetz/issue15-handle-fcc-bcc
applied soon. This is the lingering issue of bcc'ing the primary email
address in notmuch replies, which I think really needs to be
The test suite doesn't yet cover --format=json output nor UTF-8 in
subject or body.
This patch starts with test cases for 'search --format=json' and
'show --format=json'.
Furthermore, it has test cases for a search for a UTF-8 string in a mail
body for a UTF-8 string in a mail subject.
Finally,
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:50:56 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
When headers contain non-ASCII characters, they are encoded according
to rfc2047. Nomtuch reply command emits the headers in the encoded
form, which makes them hard to read by humans who compose the reply.
This feature
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
have in place:
* Any further changes from the Sebastian's repository. Sebastian, I
worked through one list I saw recently. Do you have another
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:07:48 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
Right now my plan is to do something like this:
1) look for my email address in To/Cc
2) look for my email in for em...@add.res in Received headers
3) look for my email in X-Original-To
4) look for the domain of
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:30:54 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
OK, final post from me on this issue.
No, wait! I want more from you. :-)
Would you care to put together a solution that does this from within
notmuch*.el ? I really want things usable by default without people
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:11:00 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
I'll play with both and see which is clearer.
Any progress here, Jesse?
I'd like to release notmuch 0.2 soon and would prefer not to revert this
feature, (but I also don't really want to ship it with this known bug).
Sorry -- just got back into town from some business travel. I'll be
working on it this afternoon, and will let you know by this evening
where I get with it.
Best,
Jesse
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:55:55 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:11:00 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
I just wanted to let everyone know that I think the code for the 0.2
release of notmuch is pretty much in place now. I've either merged or
decided to postpone most all of the proposed features.
I'll follow-up with another mail giving the detailed list of features
that have been merged or
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:37:49 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:07:48 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
wrote:
Right now my plan is to do something like this:
1) look for my email address in To/Cc
2) look for my email in for em...@add.res in
v.3 of this patch, now with the changes to makefiles, configure script
compat.h and all new files that I need
Please test on platforms lacking strcasestr
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
---
compat/Makefile.local|4
compat/compat.h |4
v.2 of the patch, this time including the Makefile logic.
All platforms I have access to support strcasestr - so please test
that the implementation / integration works correctly on those
plattforms.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
---
compat/have_strcasestr.c | 10
On 4/13/10 6:47 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
v.3 of this patch, now with the changes to makefiles, configure script
compat.h and all new files that I need
Please test on platforms lacking strcasestr
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndelhohn...@infradead.org
Tested-by: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
(on
There was a bug in notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag-region, which would
not behave correctly if the region went beyond the last message. Now,
instead of simply iterating to the last line of the region, these
functions will iterate to the minimum of the last line of the region
and the last possible
Some platforms don't provide DT_REG/DT_LNK/DT_DIR. Create wrapper functions
which test the presence of those symbols and fall back to stat(2).
---
Not sure if I got the handling of DT_UNKNOWN correct in all cases. Someone
please double-check that.
notmuch-new.c | 70
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:47:02 +0200, Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com wrote:
On 4/13/10 6:47 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
v.3 of this patch, now with the changes to makefiles, configure script
compat.h and all new files that I need
Please test on platforms lacking strcasestr
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:53:12 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
This series is looking like one of the most complete approaches to
maildir-flag synchronization, (and I like some of the motivation that
leads to notmuch cat). But I think the mailstore abstraction is
largely a distraction
Hi,
maybe I missread the manual but I can't find an easy way to do
something simple in notmuch.el.
Say I have a thread with A-B-C. I visit the thread and read the
whole thread. Let's say after 'notmuch new' a post has entered
the thread: A-B-C-D. Is there an easy way to just have one of
these
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:11:50 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
maybe I missread the manual but I can't find an easy way to do
something simple in notmuch.el.
Say I have a thread with A-B-C. I visit the thread and read the
whole thread. Let's say after 'notmuch new' a post has
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:19:37 +0100, James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:11:50 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
maybe I missread the manual but I can't find an easy way to do
something simple in notmuch.el.
Say I have a thread with
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:19:37 +0100, James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:11:50 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Say I have a thread with A-B-C. I visit the thread and read the
whole thread. Let's say after 'notmuch new' a post has entered
the
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:55, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:11:24 +0200, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
>> The problem I see with this approach is, that all notmuch searches are
>> build around Xapian. ...
> This does sound like a potential issue. ?I definitely don't understand
> how
-
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/dd30ea39/attachment.pgp>
On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>
> Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when tom at dbservice.com did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
> introduced
> TC> strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec
strcasestr is not part of any standard (unlike for example strcasecmp) and thus
not available on all platforms (in my case Solaris).
---
compat/Makefile.local|4
compat/compat.h |4
compat/have_strcasestr.c |8
compat/strcasestr.c | 15
On 4/13/10 6:10 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> While all systems that I have access to support strcasestr, it is
> in fact not part of POSIX. So here's a fallback reimplementation
> based on POSIX functions.
Your patch is missing the part where it adds -DHAVE_STRCASESTR=.. to
CONFIGURE_C{XX,}FLAGS.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:13:30 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> commit e55dc251b9e8001fe16873fadac565563e606d69
> Author: David Edmondson
> Date: Mon Apr 12 11:12:23 2010 +0100
>
> emacs: Add notmuch-hello.el, a friendly frontend to notmuch
I like it !
Xavier
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 14:10, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> +/* the semantic here actually puzzles me:
> + ? how can haystack be const char * - yet the return value is char *
> + ? after all, it points to a sub-string of haystack... */
Dunno if this is a question from the original source, but the
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:58:46 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:13:30 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > commit e55dc251b9e8001fe16873fadac565563e606d69
> > Author: David Edmondson
> > Date: Mon Apr 12 11:12:23 2010 +0100
> >
> > emacs: Add notmuch-hello.el, a friendly
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
> commit e55dc251b9e8001fe16873fadac565563e606d69
> Author: David Edmondson
> Date: Mon Apr 12 11:12:23 2010 +0100
>
> emacs: Add notmuch-hello.el, a friendly frontend to notmuch
Hi dme,
thanks for the great patch. For next time, could you
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:25:43 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> For next time, could you plese use 'git format-patch' for generating
> patches for sending in email? If I pipe your message to 'git am', all
> the above text becomes a part of commit message.
Will do.
dme.
--
David Edmondson,
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:59:24 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 14:10, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > +/* the semantic here actually puzzles me:
> > + ? how can haystack be const char * - yet the return value is char *
> > + ? after all, it points to a sub-string of haystack... */
>
The current hardcoded behaviour will not take you to the next unread
thread when the sort order is set to newer-first from the default of
older-first.
Signed-off-by: Servilio Afre Puentes
---
emacs/notmuch.el |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Servilio Afre Puentes
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index 517c53a..4d4971f 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch.el
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ For a mouse binding,
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/4eb398fd/attachment.pgp>
text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/9b68e96e/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:20:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Thanks for this patch, James! It's especially nice to have the fix come
> in with additions to the test suite as well.
Thanks for including a test suite I could add to!
> I did split up the commit so the addition to the test suite happens
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/bd3a780c/attachment.pgp>
-
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/220107fb/attachment.pgp>
s
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/665624a9/attachment.pgp>
have for this in my "notmuch
merge window" search is not doing the trick.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/0d0eaebc/attachment-0001.pgp>
arl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/35f72108/attachment.pgp>
itself.
Thanks again,
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/60901edb/attachment.pgp>
The test suite doesn't yet cover --format=json output nor UTF-8 in
subject or body.
This patch starts with test cases for 'search --format=json' and
'show --format=json'.
Furthermore, it has test cases for a search for a UTF-8 string in a mail
body for a UTF-8 string in a mail subject.
Finally,
t;http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/cc04e323/attachment.pgp>
message. I think they
are all merged now. Let me know if I missed anything.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/943c9a0a/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:07:48 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> Right now my plan is to do something like this:
>
> 1) look for my email address in To/Cc
> 2) look for my email in "for " in Received headers
> 3) look for my email in X-Original-To
> 4) look for the domain of my email in Received
p-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/192eeefc/attachment.pgp>
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/415e8dc2/attachment-0001.pgp>
arl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/160ebce6/attachment.pgp>
Sorry -- just got back into town from some business travel. I'll be
working on it this afternoon, and will let you know by this evening
where I get with it.
Best,
Jesse
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:55:55 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:11:00 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> >
ke the cut---but that gives
us something to look forward to next week!).
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/fb117691/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:37:49 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:07:48 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > Right now my plan is to do something like this:
> >
> > 1) look for my email address in To/Cc
> > 2) look for my email in "for " in Received headers
> > 3) look for my email in
v.3 of this patch, now with the changes to makefiles, configure script
compat.h and all new files that I need
Please test on platforms lacking strcasestr
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel
---
compat/Makefile.local|4
compat/compat.h |4
compat/have_strcasestr.c | 10
v.2 of the patch, this time including the Makefile logic.
All platforms I have access to support strcasestr - so please test
that the implementation / integration works correctly on those
plattforms.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel
---
compat/have_strcasestr.c | 10 ++
On 4/13/10 6:47 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> v.3 of this patch, now with the changes to makefiles, configure script
> compat.h and all new files that I need
> Please test on platforms lacking strcasestr
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel
Tested-by: Tomas Carnecky
(on OpenSolaris snv_134)
tom
There was a bug in notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag-region, which would
not behave correctly if the region went beyond the last message. Now,
instead of simply iterating to the last line of the region, these
functions will iterate to the minimum of the last line of the region
and the last possible
Some platforms don't provide DT_REG/DT_LNK/DT_DIR. Create wrapper functions
which test the presence of those symbols and fall back to stat(2).
---
Not sure if I got the handling of DT_UNKNOWN correct in all cases. Someone
please double-check that.
notmuch-new.c | 70
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:47:02 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> On 4/13/10 6:47 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >
> > v.3 of this patch, now with the changes to makefiles, configure script
> > compat.h and all new files that I need
> > Please test on platforms lacking strcasestr
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dirk
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:53:12 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> This series is looking like one of the most complete approaches to
> maildir-flag synchronization, (and I like some of the motivation that
> leads to "notmuch cat"). But I think the mailstore abstraction is
> largely a distraction from the
our inbox that are unread, then
you need to search for "tag:inbox and tag:unread", or type 'f' in
notmuch mode to filter your inbox search with the "tag:unread" search.
Make sense?
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: n
e mailstore type).
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100413/fa35bb5e/attachment.pgp>
70 matches
Mail list logo
