Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
Now that I'm able to start using notmuch with my actual mail, I thought I might provide some impressions from the perspective of a Gnus user. Here's what a recent bit of the notmuch list looks like in my notmuch buffer: May 03 [7/7] (null) [PATCH] Customize saved search

Re: Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
Does notmuch-search-result-format allow multiple-line formats? i.e.: [5/5] [notmuch] an other ready-to-use store option for notmuch : CouchDB Paul R., Jed Brown, martin f. krafft, James Westby (f//notmuch unread) [2/2] [notmuch] [PATCH] Do not segfault on empty mime parts martin

Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
Now that I'm able to start using notmuch with my actual mail, I thought I might provide some impressions from the perspective of a Gnus user. Here's what a recent bit of the notmuch list looks like in my notmuch buffer: May 03 [7/7] (null) [PATCH] Customize saved search

Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
Does notmuch-search-result-format allow multiple-line formats? i.e.: [5/5] [notmuch] an other ready-to-use store option for notmuch : CouchDB Paul R., Jed Brown, martin f. krafft, James Westby (f//notmuch unread) [2/2] [notmuch] [PATCH] Do not segfault on empty mime parts martin

Strings vs symbols in notmuch-search-result-format

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
I've started to look at the elisp, and wondered why notmuch-search-result-format expected strings rather than symbols for the field names, i.e.: (("date" . "%s ") ("count" . "%-7s ") ("authors" . "%-20s ") ("subject" . "%s ") ("tags" . "(%s)")) instead of