On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Daniel Goldin wrote:
>
> Setting my .mailcap doesn't seem to have any effect on how notmuch/emacs
> handles attachments. Hitting return saves no matter what.
I use 'v' key to display attachments. This shows all attachments at
once with the programs configured in .mailcap.
-M
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, da...@tethera.net wrote:
> The patches following this message are my first attempt at
> implementing atomic logging for notmuch. The idea is that such logs
> could be useful in synchronizing notmuch instances.
>
> Feedback of any kind is welcome. I'm particularly interested i
On 2010-10-11, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> I don't know how official this has to be -- just an agreed upon branch
> that people keep around next to their own personal one. Sebastian used
> to have one that served this purpose a while back, I think.
Well, it wasn't really semi-official or even blessed
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:06:17 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I'm not sure whether implementing logging facility outside of notmuch
> library is a good thing. If somebody will use a third-party tool (such
> as python bindings) to manipulate his tags, they won't appear in the
> log.
Yeah, thanks for
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, David Bremner wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:06:17 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure whether implementing logging facility outside of notmuch
> > library is a good thing. If somebody will use a third-party tool (such
> > as python bindings) to manipulate his tags
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:38:42 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
>
> Why multiple log files? You may have the buffers for message logs in
> memory, right?
Well, maybe one log for tag operations, one for adding messages, etc...
But it is easy enough to mark log entries by what they are.
>
> Another thi
da...@tethera.net writes:
> The patches following this message are my first attempt at
> implementing atomic logging for notmuch. The idea is that such logs
> could be useful in synchronizing notmuch instances.
For this to be completely safe, I suspect it may need to be adjusted to
do write ahea
Hi list,
this is my first post. I found notmuch a couple of days ago and it works
great. However I wanted to be able to ignore certain directories (mostly
.git in my case) when "notmuch new" is running.
With this patch the user can provide a list of directories which are
ignored during the recur
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
> gitorious (please vote).
I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too.
I suppose I should just set that up...
-Carl
pgp5KIeDjUuhO.pgp
Description: PGP signat
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
> > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
> > gitorious (please vote).
>
> I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too.
>
> I suppose I should
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So
>> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
>> gitorious (please vote).
>>
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Daniel Goldin wrote:
>
> Setting my .mailcap doesn't seem to have any effect on how notmuch/emacs
> handles attachments. Hitting return saves no matter what.
I use 'v' key to display attachments. This shows all attachments at
once with the programs configured in .mailcap.
-M
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, david at tethera.net wrote:
> The patches following this message are my first attempt at
> implementing atomic logging for notmuch. The idea is that such logs
> could be useful in synchronizing notmuch instances.
>
> Feedback of any kind is welcome. I'm particularly intereste
On 2010-10-11, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> I don't know how official this has to be -- just an agreed upon branch
> that people keep around next to their own personal one. Sebastian used
> to have one that served this purpose a while back, I think.
Well, it wasn't really semi-official or even blessed
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:06:17 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I'm not sure whether implementing logging facility outside of notmuch
> library is a good thing. If somebody will use a third-party tool (such
> as python bindings) to manipulate his tags, they won't appear in the
> log.
Yeah, thanks for
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, David Bremner wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:06:17 +0200, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure whether implementing logging facility outside of notmuch
> > library is a good thing. If somebody will use a third-party tool (such
> > as python bindings) to manipulate his t
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:38:42 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
>
> Why multiple log files? You may have the buffers for message logs in
> memory, right?
Well, maybe one log for tag operations, one for adding messages, etc...
But it is easy enough to mark log entries by what they are.
>
> Another thi
david at tethera.net writes:
> The patches following this message are my first attempt at
> implementing atomic logging for notmuch. The idea is that such logs
> could be useful in synchronizing notmuch instances.
For this to be completely safe, I suspect it may need to be adjusted to
do write a
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101012/579786a8/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
> > gitorious (please vote).
>
> I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too.
>
> I suppose
20 matches
Mail list logo
