Re: opening attachment

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Daniel Goldin wrote: Setting my .mailcap doesn't seem to have any effect on how notmuch/emacs handles attachments. Hitting return saves no matter what. I use 'v' key to display attachments. This shows all attachments at once with the programs configured in .mailcap.

Re: First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, da...@tethera.net wrote: The patches following this message are my first attempt at implementing atomic logging for notmuch. The idea is that such logs could be useful in synchronizing notmuch instances. Feedback of any kind is welcome. I'm particularly interested in

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-10-11, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: I don't know how official this has to be -- just an agreed upon branch that people keep around next to their own personal one. Sebastian used to have one that served this purpose a while back, I think. Well, it wasn't really semi-official or even blessed,

Re: First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, David Bremner wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:06:17 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: I'm not sure whether implementing logging facility outside of notmuch library is a good thing. If somebody will use a third-party tool (such as python bindings) to

Re: First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread Rob Browning
da...@tethera.net writes: The patches following this message are my first attempt at implementing atomic logging for notmuch. The idea is that such logs could be useful in synchronizing notmuch instances. For this to be completely safe, I suspect it may need to be adjusted to do write ahead

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too. I suppose I should just set that up... -Carl

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). I'd be glad to host something on

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote: >> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So >> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or >> gitorious (please vote).

opening attachment

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Daniel Goldin wrote: > > Setting my .mailcap doesn't seem to have any effect on how notmuch/emacs > handles attachments. Hitting return saves no matter what. I use 'v' key to display attachments. This shows all attachments at once with the programs configured in .mailcap.

First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, david at tethera.net wrote: > The patches following this message are my first attempt at > implementing atomic logging for notmuch. The idea is that such logs > could be useful in synchronizing notmuch instances. > > Feedback of any kind is welcome. I'm particularly

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-10-11, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > I don't know how official this has to be -- just an agreed upon branch > that people keep around next to their own personal one. Sebastian used > to have one that served this purpose a while back, I think. Well, it wasn't really semi-official or even

First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:06:17 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > I'm not sure whether implementing logging facility outside of notmuch > library is a good thing. If somebody will use a third-party tool (such > as python bindings) to manipulate his tags, they won't appear in the > log. Yeah, thanks for

First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, David Bremner wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:06:17 +0200, Michal Sojka > wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether implementing logging facility outside of notmuch > > library is a good thing. If somebody will use a third-party tool (such > > as python bindings) to manipulate his

First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:38:42 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > > Why multiple log files? You may have the buffers for message logs in > memory, right? Well, maybe one log for tag operations, one for adding messages, etc... But it is easy enough to mark log entries by what they are. > > Another

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread Carl Worth
t part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101012/579786a8/attachment.pgp>

notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or > > gitorious (please vote). > > I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too. > > I suppose