Re: running the crypto branch [was: Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation]

2011-02-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hey Jamie, On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:27:35 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:00:08 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: What is the easy way to switch to your codebase from notmuch mainline ? I mean, what exact commands do we need to

Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:41:48 +, Darren McGuicken mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote: If feedback is needed here then likewise, I've been running the crypto branch since it was made available. The only strangeness I've seen was that which was reported in

Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:59:54 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: But: what does the signed tag mean? i wouldn't want to necessarily conflate these four ideas: These are good points, Daniel. However, I had actually just been thinking of something much simpler, along the

Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Rob Browning
Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net writes: If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name. Are persistent tags required here?

running the crypto branch [was: Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation]

2011-02-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hey Jamie, On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:27:35 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:00:08 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > What is the easy way to switch to your codebase from notmuch mainline ? > > I mean, what exact commands do we need to type in order to use your > > branch

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110228/44071b68/attachment.pgp>

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Ross Glover
I too am now running the crypto branch and find it quite amazing. The one feature I would like added, though, is some face color or auto-tagging in the search buffer for mail with encrypted mime parts. It seems like this could be achieved with notmuch effort (by someone notme) by adding similar

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
ilable Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110228/f8089c58/attachment.pgp>

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
r a decryption succeeds? --dkg -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 1030 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110228/1bc77be0/attachment.pgp>

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
on/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110228/6a2c2577/attachment.pgp>

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
me the tags to minimize that kind of confusion? --dkg -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 1030 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110228/16d53341/attachment.pgp>

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
rd tag name. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110228/2d63f36c/attachment.pgp>

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Rob Browning
Jameson Rollins writes: > If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't > themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm > inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name. Are persistent tags required here? The original question at

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Jameson Rollins
he way to go. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110228/b27589c3/attachment.pgp>