Re: When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:42 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:39:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Can we set a target date for 0.6 release? So we'll all start feeling really bad if we miss it? Frankly, I

Re: When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:21:00 -0300, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: Overall I think Carl's time based release proposal is a reasonable plan. I think one problem we've been having is that we seem to have lost track of # Releases of notmuch have a two-digit version (0.1, 0.2,

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Austin Clements
Nifty! On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Schoepe daniel.scho...@googlemail.com wrote: +        (minibuffer-completion-table (completion-table-dynamic +                                      `(lambda (s) (notmuch-query-completions +                                               (quote

Re: When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:27:33 +0200, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: I know it is a bit off topic here but just a question: how will you deal with dependencies ? I mean, when we need GMime vX.Y.Z and Debian has already vX.V.W ? The same as every other Debian package? Try to persuade

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Daniel Schoepe
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:32:15 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Dynamic scoping is obnoxious, but I think programmed completion is steeped in the assumption that you'll use it. This code would be much simpler if notmuch-query-completions took only `string' and used the

Re: [PATCH] Added C-up and C-down to cycle through previous searches

2011-06-04 Thread Dima Kogan
On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:04:00 +0400 Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dima. On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:28 -0700, notm...@dima.secretsauce.net wrote: From: Dima Kogan d...@secretsauce.net --- Hi. I made a few improvements to the emacs UI. This patch

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Daniel Schoepe
Sorry, forgot to actually test notmuch-search entirely with this change and not just the completion. From cb172efc1dea2507566db587f960c073373e0159 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Schoepe daniel.scho...@googlemail.com Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:17:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Tab completion

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Daniel Schoepe on Jun 04 at 9:55 pm: On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:32:15 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Dynamic scoping is obnoxious, but I think programmed completion is steeped in the assumption that you'll use it. This code would be much simpler if

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Daniel Schoepe
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:55:24 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Oh, sorry, I wasn't suggesting setq'ing a global. I agree that that's really ugly. Rather, something like (defun notmuch-query-completions (string) ... as you have it now ...) (defun notmuch-read-query (prompt)

[PATCH 14/25] Fix old style notmuch-fcc-dirs configuration check.

2011-06-04 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:05:00 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:49:57 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, it says that changes are in notmuch 0.5. So "old" and "previous" > > refer to pre-0.5 (i.e. 0.4) and "new" refers to 0.5. > >

[PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Daniel Schoepe
This patch adds completion with in the minibuffer for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 33 +++-- 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el index 3311fe8..49a82be 100644 ---

[PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Daniel Schoepe
This patch adds completion with in the minibuffer for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 33 +++-- 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el index 3311fe8..7b63dc9 100644 ---

When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread David Bremner
Overall I think Carl's time based release proposal is a reasonable plan. I think one problem we've been having is that we seem to have lost track of # Releases of notmuch have a two-digit version (0.1, 0.2, etc.). We # increment the second digit for each release and increment the first

When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:39:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > Can we set a target date for 0.6 release? So we'll all start feeling > > really bad if we miss it? > > Frankly, I wouldn't mind doing strict

When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:21:00 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Overall I think Carl's time based release proposal is a reasonable > plan. I think one problem we've been having is that we seem to have lost > track of > > # Releases of notmuch have a two-digit version (0.1, 0.2, etc.). We >

[PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Austin Clements
Nifty! On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Schoepe wrote: > + ? ? ? ?(minibuffer-completion-table (completion-table-dynamic > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?`(lambda (s) (notmuch-query-completions > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (quote ,all-compls) s) > + ? ?;; ^

[PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-04 Thread Pieter Praet
Because they cause global warming. Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet --- TL;DR: Various typo fixes. Applies to jrollins/release-candidate/0.6 (2baf08f5) Due to the impending 0.6 release, I've gone off on an ephemeral typo hunt, and have brought back some trophies. As it's such an utterly amusing

When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:27:33 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > I know it is a bit off topic here but just a question: how will you deal > with dependencies ? I mean, when we need GMime vX.Y.Z and Debian has > already vX.V.W ? The same as every other Debian package? Try to persuade the maintainer

[PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Daniel Schoepe
001-emacs-Tab-completion-for-notmuch-search-and-notmuch-.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 3267 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110604/016d9e5b/attachment.patch> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

[PATCH] Added C-up and C-down to cycle through previous searches

2011-06-04 Thread Dima Kogan
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:04:00 +0400 > Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > > Hi Dima. > > On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:28 -0700, notmuch at dima.secretsauce.net > wrote: > > From: Dima Kogan > > > > --- > > > > Hi. > > > > I made a few improvements to the emacs UI. This patch allows the > > user to

[PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Daniel Schoepe
: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110604/a1a7067a/attachment.patch> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuc

[PATCH] emacs: Tab completion for notmuch-search and notmuch-search-filter

2011-06-04 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Daniel Schoepe on Jun 04 at 9:55 pm: > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:32:15 -0400, Austin Clements > wrote: > > Dynamic scoping is obnoxious, but I think programmed completion is > > steeped in the assumption that you'll use it. This code would be much > > simpler if notmuch-query-completions