Much nicer now that it uses the mm stuff.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:13:23 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> +(defun find-parts (parts type)
Sorry for being a nuisance - this needs a name that indicates that it
relates to notmuch. How about `notmuch-parts-filter-by-type'?
> + "Return a list of me
> > I wonder if the "problem" comes from me doing things in a non-lispy
> > fashion (I am completely new to lisp). Thus
> > notmuch-show-part-button-default-action is a variable that gets passed
> > around rather than a function.
>
> Sorry, I should have looked at the bigger context in this patch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:17:49 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Adam, notmuch developers,
> * Adam Wolfe Gordon [16. Jan. 2012]:
> > Add a customization option, notmuch-mua-reply-quoth, which controls
> > the first line of the reply body (typically, "On %date%, %from% wrote:").
> > This allows use
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:24 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:28, Austin Clements wrote:
> >> Having "deleted" and "spam" as default settings in the configuration
> >> file might be more reasonable.
>
> If I read correctly:
>
> 1) If no exclude options are in the confi
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:27:06 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> > +;;
>
> The above is just a stray comment line, right?
I tend to use them as spacers, but, sure.
> > +(defun notmuch-show-with-message-as-text (fn)
> > + "Apply function `fn' to a text representation of the current
> > +message."
>
> I
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:48:30 -0500, Antoine Beaupré
wrote:
> Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
> provide me with a more complete solution.
This looks good. I'll switch over to using it.
> Code is attached. Obviously, those function names would change if they
>
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:56:39 +0100, Thomas Jost wrote:
> There are lots of API changes in gmime 2.6 crypto handling. By adding
> preprocessor directives, it is however possible to add gmime 2.6 compatibility
> while preserving compatibility with gmime 2.4 too.
This approach is better than
Hi,
Just a couple of comments inline :)
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:47:14 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Thomas Jost on Jan 17 at 12:56 am:
> > There are lots of API changes in gmime 2.6 crypto handling. By adding
> > preprocessor directives, it is however possible to add gmime 2.6
> > comp
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:32:00 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Cleanup is the type of pain that should only be suffered once, so I'd
> be much happier with this if there was an accompanying git hook that
> prevented more mis-formatted code from slipping in.
We'd need a script to be called from .git
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:47:14 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Thomas Jost on Jan 17 at 12:56 am:
> > There are lots of API changes in gmime 2.6 crypto handling. By adding
> > preprocessor directives, it is however possible to add gmime 2.6
> > compatibility
> > while preserving compatibility
There are lots of API changes in gmime 2.6 crypto handling. By adding
preprocessor directives, it is however possible to add gmime 2.6 compatibility
while preserving compatibility with gmime 2.4 too.
This is mostly based on id:"8762i8hrb9@bookbinder.fernseed.info".
This was tested against bot
JSON does not support hex literals (0x..) so numbers must be formatted as %d
instead of %x.
---
notmuch-show.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-show.c b/notmuch-show.c
index d14dac9..91f566c 100644
--- a/notmuch-show.c
+++ b/notmuch-show.c
@@ -641,7
In NEWS file, indentation for item descriptions is generally 2 spaces
but in a few cases there were 3 or 4 (4 caused different markdown
handling) space indentations. Indentation in those lines are brought
to consistent 2-space indentation.
---
NEWS | 16
1 files changed, 8 inser
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:00:15 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> In NEWS file, indentation for item descriptions is generally 2 spaces
> but in a few cases there were 3 or 4 (4 caused different markdown
> handling) space indentations. Indentation in those lines are brought
> to consistent 2-space indentat
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:22:42 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:21:24 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > I'm leaning to revert this patch. Any opposition?
>
> Please revert it and I'll investigate further.
Reverted.
d
___
notmuch mai
From: David Bremner
We had a lot of back and forth about the name of this directory, but
nothing very conclusive. In the end, I just chose "devel" just to move
on.
---
RELEASING => devel/RELEASING |0
TODO => devel/TODO |0
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rena
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:50:53 +0100, Thomas Jost wrote:
> There are lots of API changes in gmime 2.6 crypto handling. By adding
> preprocessor directives, it is however possible to add gmime 2.6 compatibility
> while preserving compatibility with gmime 2.4 too.
>
> This is mostly based on id:"8762
Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
functionality.
`test_emacs_expect_t' takes two arguments:
- the name of the test,
- some lisp to evaluate.
The test passes if the lisp returns `t', otherwise it fails and the
output is reported to the tester.
---
test/emacs-test-funct
`mail-header-parse-address' expects un-decoded mailbox parts, which is
not what we have at this point. Replace it with simple string
deconstruction.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 48 +++-
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/e
Taking Dmitry's suggestions on board. The end result does indeed feel
better, thanks!
[PATCH 1/4] test: Add `test_emacs_expect_t'.
[PATCH 2/4] test: Add address cleaning tests.
[PATCH 3/4] emacs: Avoid `mail-header-parse-address' in
[PATCH 4/4] emacs: Another special case for
_
Remove backslashes.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el| 14 +-
test/address-cleaning.el |6 --
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 8b2fbb3..90c9c05 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuc
Including some more test framework in test-lib.el.
---
test/address-cleaning.el | 29 +
test/address-cleaning.sh | 11 +++
test/notmuch-test|1 +
test/test-lib.el | 29 +
4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:52:25 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
> functionality.
>
> `test_emacs_expect_t' takes two arguments:
> - the name of the test,
> - some lisp to evaluate.
>
> The test passes if the lisp returns `t', otherwise i
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:52:26 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Including some more test framework in test-lib.el.
> ---
> test/address-cleaning.el | 29 +
> test/address-cleaning.sh | 11 +++
> test/notmuch-test|1 +
> test/test-lib.el |
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:48:34 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:50:53 +0100, Thomas Jost wrote:
> > There are lots of API changes in gmime 2.6 crypto handling. By adding
> > preprocessor directives, it is however possible to add gmime 2.6
> > compatibility
> > while preserving co
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:11:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Since test/ directory is used for all kind of tests not just Emacs
> UI-specific, so I think address-cleaning.* files should be
> emacs-address-cleaning.
Okay.
pgpjWFrQsKV9M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
(And one for the list...)
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:09:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> -1
>
> This is not what I suggested. I do not like the approach when a single
> function is used to both declare a subtest and test for result (as
> opposed to test_begin_subtest). The fact that it is poss
This makes `show-trailing-whitespace' happy, i.e. it does not mark the
whole search box line as trailing spaces.
Since the dot is invisible, this change makes no visible difference
for `notmuch-hello'.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
index a71f3ce..aed1fb3 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ Complete list of currently available key
---
test/test-lib.sh |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/test-lib.sh b/test/test-lib.sh
index d1fbc05..7c9ce24 100644
--- a/test/test-lib.sh
+++ b/test/test-lib.sh
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ test_emacs () {
--eval '(orphan-watchdo
Including some more test framework in test-lib.el.
---
notmuch-test-address-cleaning-3 currently fails, in order that you can
see the output format in that case.
test/emacs-address-cleaning.el | 29 +
test/emacs-address-cleaning.sh | 12
test/notmuch-
Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
functionality.
`test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a list expression to
evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it
fails and the output is reported to the tester.
---
Re-worked as Dmitry suggested.
test/
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:24:45 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> This makes `show-trailing-whitespace' happy, i.e. it does not mark the
> whole search box line as trailing spaces.
Why should `whitespace-mode' be active in `notmuch-hello' buffers?
pgpEE8lecgUob.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:08:58 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:24:45 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > This makes `show-trailing-whitespace' happy, i.e. it does not mark the
> > whole search box line as trailing spaces.
>
> Why should `whitespace-mode' be active in `notm
Can you please elaborate why this is needed?
Regards,
Dmitry
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:13:26 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:08:58 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:24:45 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > wrote:
> > > This makes `show-trailing-whitespace' happy, i.e. it does not mark the
> > > whole search box line
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:07:03 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
> functionality.
>
> `test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a list expression to
> evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it
> fails and the outpu
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:26:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Sorry, I still do not understand why we can not implement
> test_emacs_expect_t() like:
>
> result=${test_emacs $@}
> test_expect_equal $result t
>
> Can you please explain?
In the failure case test_expect_equal does:
test_fa
(And for the list...)
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:20:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Can you please elaborate why this is needed?
This code:
# wait until the emacs server is up
until test_emacs '()' 2>/dev/null; do
sleep 1
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:35:07 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:26:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > Sorry, I still do not understand why we can not implement
> > test_emacs_expect_t() like:
> >
> > result=${test_emacs $@}
> > test_expect_equal $result t
> >
> > C
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:37:52 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> (And for the list...)
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:20:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > Can you please elaborate why this is needed?
>
> This code:
>
> # wait until the emacs server is up
> un
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:49:36 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> > + # We cannot call 'test_emacs' in a subshell, because
> > + # the setting of EMACS_SERVER would not persist
> > + # throughout a sequence of tests, so we use a
> > + # temporary file.
> > +
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:07:07 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> Uncrustify is a free (as in GPL2+) tool that indents and beautifies
> C/C++ code. It is similar to GNU indent in functionality although
> probably more configurable (in fairness, indent has better
> documentation)
>(if (and force (re-search-forward "<#secure [> >]*>\n" nil t))
> (replace-match "" nil nil))
>;; If we can encrypt, do so, else just sign.
>(if (or force (not (re-search-forward "<#secure [> >]*>\n" nil t)))
Is this second test for `force' necessary? If `force' is
This makes `show-trailing-whitespace' happy, i.e. it does not mark the
whole search box line as trailing spaces.
Since the dot is invisible, this change makes no visible difference
for `notmuch-hello'.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+1.
pgpAZYyk0EXbW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Hi David,
Thanks for the review. A couple of comments inline:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:04, David Edmondson wrote:
>> + (insert "\n")
>> + (set-buffer-modified-p nil)))
>
> Is this newline always required? Is it the cause of the spurious blank
> line down below?
This is the cause of the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 00:17, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> I really missed this feature in notmuch. There is already
> message-citation-line-format which is part of message mode or
> gnus and is not used in notmuch. Wouldn't it be more consistent
> to reuse this?
Glad to hear someone would use the
Hi,
Emacs notmuch is a really excellent mail program.
But today I got an infinite loop in emacs 24.0.92.1 with notmuch (0.11
and master). It only happens when viewing a certain thread.
There seem to be 2 problems:
1. the n and p keys (notmuch-show-{next,previous}-open-message) can't
get past
Rodney,
After converting the mbox file to Maildir and adding it to my mailstore,
I cannot reproduce the loop. (The versions of notmuch and emacs I used
are close to the ones you have, but not an exact match, so it may be
something subtle about those versions. I can investigate
more carefully if
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Jan 17 at 12:46 pm:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:32:00 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > Cleanup is the type of pain that should only be suffered once, so I'd
> > be much happier with this if there was an accompanying git hook that
> > prevented more mis-formatted code from slippi
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:34:31 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 16 at 10:21 pm:
> > This is also interesting:
> > $ notmuch count 'debian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'dEbian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'Debian'
> > 65887
>
> The first two will match stemmed versions
I have reworked the show-mode message/thread archiving improvements from
two now-obsolete patch sets:
id:"1325975294-646-1-git-send-email-jroll...@finestructure.net"
id:"1325986015-22510-1-git-send-email-jroll...@finestructure.net"
All the "delete" stuff has been removed from this series, and I j
This provides a smoother message processing flow by reducing the
number of key presses needed for these common operations.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 6b2e6e9..21eadbe 100644
This adds two new message archiving functions that parallel the thread
archiving functions: notmuch-show-archive-message{,-then-next}. The
former also takes a prefix argument to unarchive the message (ie. put
back in inbox).
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 17 +
1 files changed, 17
This changes the default key bindings for the 'a' key in notmuch-show
mode. Instead of archiving the entire thread, it now just archives
the current message, and then advance to the next open message
(archive-message-then-next). 'A' is now bound to the previous
archive-thread-then-next function.
Brake up notmuch-show-archive-thread-internal into two new functions:
notmuch-show-tag-thread-internal: applies a tag to all messages in
thread. If option remove flag is t, tags will be removed instead of
added.
notmuch-show-next-thread: moves to the next thread in the search
result. If given a
This will allow for keybindings that achieve a smoother message
processing flow by reducing the number of key presses needed for most
common operations.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 12 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmu
This function is now just for archiving the current thread. A new
function is created to archive-then-next. The 'a' key binding is
updated accordingly.
This will allow people to bind to the simple thread archiving function
without the extra navigation. The archive-thread function now also
takes
---
.gitignore |1 -
man/.gitignore |2 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 man/.gitignore
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d64ec9f..d428290 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ tags
/notmuch
notmuch.sym
notmuch-shar
+1.
jamie.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:37:52 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> After converting the mbox file to Maildir and adding it to my mailstore,
> I cannot reproduce the loop. (The versions of notmuch and emacs I used
> are close to the ones you have, but not an exact match, so it may be
> something subtle about
This removes an inaccuracy in the thread archiving function, and adds
a clarification to the message archiving function.
---
Late catch on some documentation inaccuracies. Apologies.
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 11 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/no
Use this standard function, to keep thread navigation in one place.
---
emacs/notmuch.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index ef4dcc7..e4bca51 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch.el
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ thr
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:16:03 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> ---
> .gitignore |1 -
> man/.gitignore |2 ++
pushed,
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Now that Austin's excellent tag exclusion patch set [0] has been pushed,
the question remains if we want to support any delete-handling key
bindings in emacs.
Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following
patch set implements thread and message delete keys.
This is the la
No functional change here. The help message previously referred to
the "delete" tag, but "deleted" is now preferred, so hopefully this
will reduce any potential confusion.
---
emacs/notmuch.el |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/not
This mimics the archiving keys ('a' and 'A').
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el |2 ++
emacs/notmuch.el |1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 141241d..f0259d5 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/emacs/notm
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 46 ++
emacs/notmuch.el |8
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index c1d721e..141241d 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/emac
Before the change, "s" in notmuch-hello buffer would jump to the
search box. The patch changes the binding to `notmuch-search' which
is consistent with all other notmuch buffers.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 19 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a
There are two ways to do search in Emacs UI: search widget in
notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search' function bound to "s".
Before the change, these search mechanisms used different history
lists. The patch makes notmuch-hello search use the same history list
as `notmuch-search' function.
---
`notmuch-hello-search' uses `notmuch-search' function but refreshes
notmuch-hello buffer when the search buffer is closed.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
index cb36977..e908659
Hello.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:20 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:39:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:35:37 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > > wrote:
> > > > Before the change, ther
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 17 at 7:43 pm:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:34:31 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 16 at 10:21 pm:
> > > This is also interesting:
> > > $ notmuch count 'debian'
> > > 65888
> > > $ notmuch count 'dEbian'
> > > 65888
> > > $ notmuch count 'Debian'
+1 on this series from me. (Minor comments on a couple of the patches
to follow.)
--
Aaron Ecay
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:05:26 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Brake up notmuch-show-archive-thread-internal into two new functions:
>
> notmuch-show-tag-thread-internal: applies a tag to all messages in
> thread. If option remove flag is t, tags will be removed instead of
> added.
>
> not
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:05:28 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> This adds two new message archiving functions that parallel the thread
> archiving functions: notmuch-show-archive-message{,-then-next}. The
> former also takes a prefix argument to unarchive the message (ie. put
> back in inbox)
+1
--
Aaron Ecay
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:10:40 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> This should be a docstring instead of a comment. (This applies equally
> to the old version)
We're not currently in the habit of adding doc strings for
non-interactive programs. Do we need to go down that route?
jamie.
pgpxWGCN6f8xU
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:13:47 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> If this function uses the prefix arg, its interactive call should be
> “(interactive "P")”. This applies equally to the -thread variant in
> patch 2/6, but I made the comment here because that diff doesn’t show
> the function contiguously.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Now that Austin's excellent tag exclusion patch set [0] has been pushed,
> the question remains if we want to support any delete-handling key
> bindings in emacs.
>
> Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the f
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 17 at 9:06 am:
>
> > > I wonder if the "problem" comes from me doing things in a non-lispy
> > > fashion (I am completely new to lisp). Thus
> > > notmuch-show-part-button-default-action is a variable that gets passed
> > > around rather than a function.
> >
> > Sorry,
Quoth David Edmondson on Jan 17 at 9:08 am:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:24 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:28, Austin Clements wrote:
> > >> Having "deleted" and "spam" as default settings in the configuration
> > >> file might be more reasonable.
> >
> > If I re
> > I am happy to make that change. My original patch in the summer was more
> > like that:
> > id:"caludzswato+4mcuoomk+8vfs+pog-xuma6u-aqx2m6-sbyq...@mail.gmail.com"
>
> Is this the right id? I couldn't find it in the list archive.
Sorry I messed up: it should be id:"87mxehqhbl.fsf@r102.confi
Quoth Thomas Jost on Jan 17 at 11:48 am:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:47:14 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > Quoth Thomas Jost on Jan 17 at 12:56 am:
> > > This is mostly based on id:"8762i8hrb9@bookbinder.fernseed.info".
> > >
> > > This was tested against both gmime 2.6.4 and 2.4.31. With gmim
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:26:03 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 17 at 9:06 am:
> >
> > > > I wonder if the "problem" comes from me doing things in a non-lispy
> > > > fashion (I am completely new to lisp). Thus
> > > > notmuch-show-part-button-default-action is a variable
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:17:54 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
>
> We're not currently in the habit of adding doc strings for
> non-interactive programs. Do we need to go down that route?
It is handy for developers, since the usual documentation facilities
(describe-function, apropos, ...) w
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 17 at 8:39 pm:
> > > I am happy to make that change. My original patch in the summer was more
> > > like that:
> > > id:"caludzswato+4mcuoomk+8vfs+pog-xuma6u-aqx2m6-sbyq...@mail.gmail.com"
> >
> > Is this the right id? I couldn't find it in the list archive.
>
> Sorry
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:34:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Before the change, "s" in notmuch-hello buffer would jump to the
> search box. The patch changes the binding to `notmuch-search' which
> is consistent with all other notmuch buffers.
> ---
> emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 19 ++--
Hi there. I've seen gmime related discussion but it's hard to follow using
a web interface, so here's my bug report.
Arch Linux x86_64
gmime 2.6.4
notmuch git, last commit: 8ea82928b91e847298e4586f9db9734e727a418a
Build error:
CC -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector
--param=s
[of course I sent this email privately, sorry for duplicates]
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:22:30 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:34:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > Before the change, "s" in notmuch-hello buffer would jump to the
> > search box. The patch changes the bindin
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
[ ... ]
> Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following
> patch set implements thread and message delete keys.
>
> This is the last I'm going to comment on this issue. If we don't want
> to support
On Lu, 16 ian 12, 21:34:31, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 16 at 10:21 pm:
> > This is also interesting:
> > $ notmuch count 'debian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'dEbian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'Debian'
> > 65887
>
> The first two will match stemmed versions of "debi
Quoth Thomas Jost on Jan 17 at 11:50 am:
> There are lots of API changes in gmime 2.6 crypto handling. By adding
> preprocessor directives, it is however possible to add gmime 2.6 compatibility
> while preserving compatibility with gmime 2.4 too.
>
> This is mostly based on id:"8762i8hrb9@book
> In general, yes, I think so. A few comments on your draft below.
Ok I include a newer version which I am fairly happy with but I do have
some queries.
> > +(defvar notmuch-show-part-button-map
> > + (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap)))
> > + (set-keymap-parent map button-map)
> > +
Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 18 at 12:14 am:
> On Lu, 16 ian 12, 21:34:31, Austin Clements wrote:
> > Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 16 at 10:21 pm:
> > > Where can I read more about this? (except the source :)
> >
> > Most of this is in the Xapian query syntax document you found. Really
> > we ought
Quoth hollun...@lavabit.com on Jan 17 at 4:24 pm:
> Hi there. I've seen gmime related discussion but it's hard to follow using
> a web interface, so here's my bug report.
There's a GMime 2.6 support patch that will probably make it into the
master branch in the next day or two. Sorry for the inc
Hi,
Actually, this is starting to look like a problem with gnus in the
latest emacs-snapshot.
I didn't notice before, but when I view the thread, I get this error:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable gnus-inhibit-images)
mm-shr((# ("text/html") nil nil nil nil nil nil))
mm-inline-te
Using the new JSON reply format allows emacs to quote HTML
parts nicely by using mm-display-part to turn them into displayable
text, then quoting them. This is very useful for users who
regularly receive HTML-only email.
The behavior for messages that contain plain text parts should be
unchanged.
Instead of using a static citation line for the first line of the
reply message, use the customizable one defined by message-mode.
This makes it easy for users to customize the reply style, and
retains consistency for users with existing message-mode
customizations.
The test has been updated to re
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
