Hello
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>> This is a new version of notmuch-pick (previous version at
>> id:"1343164911-31589-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com")following
>> suggestions of Tomi and David in that thread. The main change is that
>> it is
The test should be run using the wrapper test-wrapper.sh. This links
the tests into the normal notmuch TEST_DIRECTORY and runs them from
there. After the test is complete then the links are removed.
---
Here are some tests for notmuch-pick. I would have liked to include
the test structure and run
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:37:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> notmuch currently treats all messages with the same Message-ID as
> the same message. I think this could be a vulnerability :(
>
> If two messages have the same Message-ID, is there a guarantee of which
> of these messages will be
Hello,
attached you can find a message which seems to trigger a bug somewhere
in my notmuch setup. The message has been sent to me and includes a
patchfile, which, when saved using the "w" key in notmuch-emacs, cannot
be applied.
When using munpack(1) on the raw mail file (I’ve attached rawmail.g
From: Michal Nazarewicz
This commit adds a note to the NEWS file about Bcc header now being
available in the JSON output (and thus in Emacs) which has been
implemented by commit ffb629cc5d2c2d1505eb5aefcf04fb4d0af6c0c8.
---
NEWS |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
d
On Mon, Oct 29 2012, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached you can find a message which seems to trigger a bug somewhere
> in my notmuch setup. The message has been sent to me and includes a
> patchfile, which, when saved using the "w" key in notmuch-emacs, cannot
> be applied.
>
> When
I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting
investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting
the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attention to the
message id.
notmuch can find the mail when I search by the from field:
$ notmuch search "from
On Mon, Oct 29 2012, James Vasile wrote:
> I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting
> investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting
> the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attention to the
> message id.
>
> notmuch can find the mail wh
Tomi Ollila writes:
> On Mon, Oct 29 2012, James Vasile wrote:
>
>> I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting
>> investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting
>> the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attention to the
>> message id.
>>
>
My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal
bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't
want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo
tags from the 'search' view.
---
emacs/notmuch.el |7 ++-
1 file changed, 6
James Vasile writes:
> My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal
> bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't
> want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo
> tags from the 'search' view.
I understand this scratc
David Bremner writes:
> James Vasile writes:
>
>> My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal
>> bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't
>> want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo
>> tags from the 'search' v
This patch hides any tags in search view that match the regex specified
in `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex`. That variable can be set via setq
or the customize interface. To hide all tags that begin with "x-" or
"X-", set `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex` to "^X-".
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 16
I like it.
Quoth James Vasile on Oct 29 at 5:19 pm:
> This patch hides any tags in search view that match the regex specified
> in `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex`. That variable can be set via setq
> or the customize interface. To hide all tags that begin with "x-" or
> "X-", set `notmuch-searc
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Overall this looks pretty good to me, and I must say, this parser is
> amazingly flexible and copes well with a remarkably hostile grammar.
>
> A lot of little comments below (sorry if any of this ground has
> already been covered in the previous four
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Jani Nikula on Oct 22 at 12:22 am:
>> Test the date/time parser module directly, independent of notmuch,
>> using the parse-time test tool.
>>
>> Credits to Michal Sojka for writing most of the
>> tests.
>> ---
>> test/notmuch-test |1
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Jani Nikula on Oct 22 at 12:22 am:
>> Add a custom value range processor to enable date and time searches of
>> the form date:since..until, where "since" and "until" are expressions
>> understood by the previously added date/time parser, to restr
Many thanks, I'll incorporate most of your suggestions as-is.
BR,
Jani.
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Jani Nikula on Oct 22 at 12:22 am:
>> ---
>> man/man7/notmuch-search-terms.7 | 147
>> +++
>> 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+), 12
.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Hello
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>> This is a new version of notmuch-pick (previous version at
>> id:"1343164911-31589-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com")following
>> suggestions of Tomi and David in that thread. The main change is that
>> it
The test should be run using the wrapper test-wrapper.sh. This links
the tests into the normal notmuch TEST_DIRECTORY and runs them from
there. After the test is complete then the links are removed.
---
Here are some tests for notmuch-pick. I would have liked to include
the test structure and run
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:37:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> notmuch currently treats all messages with the same Message-ID as
> the same message. I think this could be a vulnerability :(
>
> If two messages have the same Message-ID, is there a guarantee of which
> of these messages will be
-- next part --
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Conley Moorhous
Subject: Re: User Guide Chapter 6 typo
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:59:50 -0500
Size: 9355
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20121029/ee441e65/attachment.mht>
-- next part
From: Michal Nazarewicz
This commit adds a note to the NEWS file about Bcc header now being
available in the JSON output (and thus in Emacs) which has been
implemented by commit ffb629cc5d2c2d1505eb5aefcf04fb4d0af6c0c8.
---
NEWS |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
d
On Mon, Oct 29 2012, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached you can find a message which seems to trigger a bug somewhere
> in my notmuch setup. The message has been sent to me and includes a
> patchfile, which, when saved using the "w" key in notmuch-emacs, cannot
> be applied.
>
> When
I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting
investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting
the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attention to the
message id.
notmuch can find the mail when I search by the from field:
$ notmuch search "from
On Mon, Oct 29 2012, James Vasile wrote:
> I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting
> investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting
> the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attention to the
> message id.
>
> notmuch can find the mail wh
t;
> note that id:"..." does not suffice as shell expands $ & ` inside double
> quotes.
Tomi, that's a good catch and one I should have noticed. Thanks much
for the help!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20121029/35aa6d42/attachment.pgp>
" ")))
(insert (propertize (format format-string tags-str)
'face 'notmuch-tag-face))
--
1.7.10.4
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
James Vasile writes:
> My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal
> bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't
> want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo
> tags from the 'search' view.
I understand this scratc
rite it with a regex the user can customize.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20121029/4933c10f/attachment.pgp>
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20121029/6509438e/attachment.pgp>
I like it.
Quoth James Vasile on Oct 29 at 5:19 pm:
> This patch hides any tags in search view that match the regex specified
> in `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex`. That variable can be set via setq
> or the customize interface. To hide all tags that begin with "x-" or
> "X-", set `notmuch-searc
33 matches
Mail list logo
