notmuch new: emails with BOM are ignored

2014-05-27 Thread Andreas Amann
Hi, I recently received some spam mails, which have a utf-16 byte order mark (BOM) U+FEFF as the first character in one of their Received: lines. When I run notmuch new I get the following: Note: Ignoring non-mail file: /home/user/Mail/new/path_to_email_with_BOM Could this be a bug in notmuch?

Displaying read messages collapsed in Emacs

2014-05-27 Thread kototama kototama
Hello, When the user display a thread by pressing enter in the notmuch show view, the elisp function notmuch-search-show-thread is called. Is it possible to display the thread with messages that have not the unread tag collapsed ? Best regards ___

Re: notmuch new: emails with BOM are ignored

2014-05-27 Thread David Bremner
Andreas Amann a.am...@ucc.ie writes: Could this be a bug in notmuch? Possible emails with BOM are not legal anyhow, but in my opinion it would be better to simply ignore the BOM. I am using notmuch 0.18. As of 0.18 notmuch is using the gmime mail parser exclusively. It could be a

notmuch new: emails with BOM are ignored

2014-05-27 Thread Andreas Amann
Hi, I recently received some spam mails, which have a utf-16 byte order mark (BOM) U+FEFF as the first character in one of their "Received:" lines. When I run "notmuch new" I get the following: Note: Ignoring non-mail file: /home/user/Mail/new/path_to_email_with_BOM Could this be a bug in

Displaying read messages collapsed in Emacs

2014-05-27 Thread kototama kototama
attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140527/c6029446/attachment.html>

Usage of tag:replied

2014-05-27 Thread Wael Nasreddine
Hi, I'm trying to take advantage of the tag:replied to give higher priority to emails sent to very busy lists but it seems that it's not returning the results that I am expecting. $ notmuch search tag:unread AND from:lydia thread:0001a791 Today 17:20 [1/10] Lydia | Wael Nasreddine;