On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
(Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)
> What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
> machines?
>
> In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered
> identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:16PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
> (Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)
>
> > What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
> > machines?
> >
> > In my own case the contents of the mail stor
On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:16PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
>> (Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)
>>
>> > What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
>> > machines?
>>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:26:26PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > Does nmbug not do this for you? This is exactly what it was designed
> > to do (sync tags).
>
> Perhaps. Is anyone using it for personal tag sync?
I will once my Python translation l
On Sun, Jul 06 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> For folks that want to start versioning a new tag-space, instead of
> cloning one that someone else has already started.
I tried this patch, and it (appeared) to work for me. Given that the
procedure for creating a new tag repository is arcane, could th
On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:13:50PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 06 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> > For folks that want to start versioning a new tag-space, instead
>> > of cloning one that someone else has already started.
>>
>> I tried
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:13:50PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > For folks that want to start versioning a new tag-space, instead
> > of cloning one that someone else has already started.
>
> I tried this patch, and it (appeared) to work for me. Giv
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:32:59PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:13:50PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 06 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> >> > For folks that want to start versioning a new tag-space, instead
"W. Trevor King" writes:
>
> Give it a spin to kick the tires, and reply to the v4 patch saying
> that none of the pieces fell off while you were kicking it ;).
> Basically, it's just waiting for review and a consensus that it's a
> solid change.
v3 crashed when merging quite often for me. I'm s
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:09:11PM +0200, David Bremner wrote:
> W. Trevor King writes:
> > Give it a spin to kick the tires, and reply to the v4 patch saying
> > that none of the pieces fell off while you were kicking it ;).
> > Basically, it's just waiting for review and a consensus that it's
> >
On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
(Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)
> What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
> machines?
>
> In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered
> identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is
part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140915/268106f0/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:16PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
>> (Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)
>>
>> > What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
>> > machines?
>>
:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140915/b9c1912d/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Jul 06 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> For folks that want to start versioning a new tag-space, instead of
> cloning one that someone else has already started.
I tried this patch, and it (appeared) to work for me. Given that the
procedure for creating a new tag repository is arcane, could th
On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:13:50PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 06 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> > For folks that want to start versioning a new tag-space, instead
>> > of cloning one that someone else has already started.
>>
>> I tried
application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140915/dbd21e96/attachment-0001.pgp>
y_Good_Privacy
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140915/9ed11e5c/attachment.pgp>
"W. Trevor King" writes:
>
> Give it a spin to kick the tires, and reply to the v4 patch saying
> that none of the pieces fell off while you were kicking it ;).
> Basically, it's just waiting for review and a consensus that it's a
> solid change.
v3 crashed when merging quite often for me. I'm s
s
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140915/c8a3f894/attachment.pgp>
20 matches
Mail list logo
