Hi
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
When no --output option were given, change default to display senders
only. This is faster and provides useful-enough list of addresses.
When only --count option is given, display senders (in contrary to not
displaying anything).
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
-This option has no effect when used with --output=count.
+This option affects the seemingly random output order when
+used with --output=count.
I know what this means but it confused me at first. How about When
used with
On Thu, Nov 06 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
When no --output option were given, change default to display senders
only. This is faster and provides useful-enough list of addresses.
When only --count option is given, display senders (in contrary to not
displaying anything).
Document how --count
When no --output option were given, change default to display senders
only.
When only --count option is given, display senders (in contrary to not
displaying anything).
Document that --count with --sort=**order** is not supported option
combination.
Clean up some whitespace in the
Hello everyone :),
I like Git, so when folks suggest storing things in Git, I'm usually
excited ;). Eric Wong has been working on some tools to store email
in a Git repository, and his client-side code is ssoma [1]. I wanted
a bit more metadata than the stock ssoma-mda [2], and ended up just
Here is a subjectively trimmed list of commits for 0.19. Please send
NEWS patches for anything (either your own contributions or those of
others) you think is important to users or downstream developers.
Austin Clements:
emacs: Clarify that notmuch-poll-script is deprecated
lib:
Hi
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> When no --output option were given, change default to display senders
> only. This is faster and provides useful-enough list of addresses.
>
> When only --count option is given, display senders (in contrary to not
> displaying anything).
>
> Document
Mark Walters writes:
>> -This option has no effect when used with --output=count.
>> +This option affects the seemingly random output order when
>> +used with --output=count.
>
> I know what this means but it confused me at first. How about "When
> used with --output=count
On Thu, Nov 06 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> When no --output option were given, change default to display senders
> only. This is faster and provides useful-enough list of addresses.
>
> When only --count option is given, display senders (in contrary to not
> displaying anything).
>
> Document how
When no --output option were given, change default to display senders
only.
When only --count option is given, display senders (in contrary to not
displaying anything).
Document that --count with --sort=**order** is not supported option
combination.
Clean up some whitespace in the
nformation, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20141107/34578f0e/attachment-0001.pgp>
11 matches
Mail list logo