On Thu, Nov 21 2019, Johan Parin wrote:
> Johan Parin writes:
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>>>
>>> Is it that much worse to pass around the notmuch_database_t *?
My opinion is that we should not use the static notmuch_database_t
pointer. I think any desire to reach for that is, at best,
Add a new flag --extra-headers to notmuch show, in order to let the
user specify displayed headers using `notmuch-message-headers' in the
emacs mua.
The flag will impact which headers are output in
format_headers_sprinter.
The emacs mua will generate the --extra-headers flag based on
Modify format_headers_sprinter so that it returns all headers in the
sexp, instead of a fixed set of headers.
This is required in order for the elisp variable
`notmuch-message-headers' to work.
See this bug report:
https://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2017/026069.html
---
notmuch-show.c
This is a refinement of my first two submissions, cleaned up and also
working with reply, which the first versions were not:
1) notmuch-show returns all headers
2) notmuch-show returns extra headers configured by a command line
option, which is passed from the emacs mua.
As for the second, I
