ping
--
Anton Khirnov
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Anton Khirnov writes:
> ping
I'm hoping Floris will find a chance to review your patches.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Thu 2020-05-21 00:16:48 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> (just tested this latest works)
Thanks for looking into this, Tomi!
Do you have a patch to propose?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.
On Mon 2020-05-04 09:25:59 +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> * Keegan Carruthers-Smith [2020-05-03; 22:37]:
>> notmuch tag -waiting -- tag:waiting and 'thread:{tag:new}'
>
> but this removes the waiting tag if there is some response
> to some message in the thread, not necessary to the message
> ta
On Mon 2020-05-04 00:21:36 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> Fixed emacs docstrings to be consistent. No functional change.
>
> - removed some (accidental) indentation
> - removed some trailing newlines
> - added trailing periods where missing (some exclusions)
This all looks good to me, except for the
On Wed 2020-05-13 20:00:24 +1000, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
> notmuch-expr allows you to write notmuch search queries in sexp style like:
>
> (notmuch-expr
> '(and
> (to "emacs-devel")
> "info manual"
> (or
> (not (is "spam"))
> (is "important"
>
> which will generate the t
On Thu, May 21 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2020-05-21 00:16:48 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> (just tested this latest works)
>
> Thanks for looking into this, Tomi!
>
> Do you have a patch to propose?
Looked a bit (now). Somewhat complicated to make perfect (enemy of good)
change.
p
On Thu, May 21 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2020-05-04 00:21:36 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> Fixed emacs docstrings to be consistent. No functional change.
>>
>> - removed some (accidental) indentation
>> - removed some trailing newlines
>> - added trailing periods where missing (some
On Sat 2020-05-02 20:11:09 -0400, Radu Butoi wrote:
> This uses the standard Emacs function `split-window-sensibly` to split a
> window horizontally or vertically depending on space when opening a
> message in tree view. By default, split-width-threshold is 160 columns
> (and -height- is nil), so
Hi Anton,
Thanks for improving the bindings! Any my apologies for the late
response, I failed to spot this mail the first time round.
Also, this is a pretty serious bug, thanks for finding it.
This looks pretty solid, a few small style comments that aren't very
important notwithstanding. Thoug
Thanks for adding more of the API!
This mostly is fine as well, again I'd mainly ask to add tests however.
At least the things which are implemented directly I guess: setitem,
getitem, iter and len.
On Sat 09 May 2020 at 07:05 +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> ---
> bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/_
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> When checking cryptographic signatures, Notmuch relies on GMime to
> tell it whether the certificate that signs a message has a valid User
> ID or not.
>
> If the User ID is not valid, then notmuch does not report the signer's
> User ID to the user. This means that
When checking cryptographic signatures, Notmuch relies on GMime to
tell it whether the certificate that signs a message has a valid User
ID or not.
If the User ID is not valid, then notmuch does not report the signer's
User ID to the user. This means that the consumer of notmuch's
cryptographic s
Thanks for the review, and for the poke about out-of-tree builds on IRC,
Bremner. Another revision is coming in a minute. Notes below…
On Thu 2020-05-21 20:29:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I find these long lines with !! in the middle pretty surprising. Is
> there some reason for this style?
On Fri 2020-05-22 00:57:14 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> We've accumulated quite a bit of mess during these years to the test
> system, which makes it harder to do larger adjustments (and not (yet)
> mentioning even larger refactorings...).
The last significant refactoring was probably when jrollins
This is a simple hack to enable out-of-tree builds, a concern raised
by Tomi in id:m24kzjib9a@guru.guru-group.fi
This change at least enables "make check" to complete without error,
but I'm sure it could be improved. I am not expert enough in
setuptools to know how.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kah
On Mon 2019-11-04 23:26:25 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do
> the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does
> python provide better alternative..?
I've just posted id:20200522010359.715688-1-...@fifthhorsem
In out-of-tree builds, $TEST_DIRECTORY doesn't contain
json_check_nodes.py. This caused 27 tests to fail in such an
environment.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
---
test/test-lib.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/test/test-lib.sh b/test/test-lib.sh
index
Hey folks--
I just did a bit of testing and cleanup for out-of-tree builds (see the
minor patches that should have landed on the list in the last hour or
two).
For me, "make check" in an out-of-tree build works fine now, with the
exception of T391-python-cffi.sh and T395-ruby.sh.
I'm afraid i do
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> I like this proposal, and the simplification that it gives to the
> notmuch-emacs codebase. However, this thread is the first place i've
> learned about split-window-sensibly, so i'm probably not eligible to
> really judge the merits here.
For some historical conte
20 matches
Mail list logo
