[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-14 Thread Arvid Picciani
Hi, how do you add new mails to the index? manual says notmuch new should be enough, but it simply says No new mail. on the first run (when no .notmuch is there yet), it finds some messages, but doesn't index them either. $ notmuch search tag:inbox $ $ notmuch search s $ -- Arvid Asgaard

Re: [notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 07:09 AM, Carl Worth wrote: Your original patch was sent as application/octet-stream which made it awkward to read, (I would have to manually save it rather than just being able to read it within emacs with notmuch). uum yeah thanks. I'll try to figure out how this works. But

Re: [notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 03:29 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote: done I'm still not sure what is slow for you, scanning 60k mails. :D That's not fixable, other then by not doing that. but I'm also not sure how the above would help. It doesn't scan all 60K individually but only the single new one

Re: [notmuch] [PATCHv2] Preserve folder information when indexing

2010-02-02 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojkasojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a term with folder prefix. unfortunately it doesnt do anything here :/ i rebuilt the entire index, but no folder: field is added. can anyone who got

Re: [notmuch] [PATCHv2] Preserve folder information when indexing

2010-02-02 Thread Arvid Picciani
It's all the dots fault. it works just fine with folders not beginning with . On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: I'm going back to my original suggestion, which was that the configuration should state tag that should be added for messages

Re: [notmuch] What's so great about notmuch?

2010-02-28 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:08:49 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: What's your favorite thing about notmuch? It's the only email index that respects unix ideas, and hence the only usable to me. It doesn't do _everything_ but limits itself to indexing, while doing a great job at that.

Re: bug tracking

2010-04-26 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:31:05 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: For example, if dme commits a fix and marks issue #217 closed with that fix, then I'd like my repository of bugs to also know to close that issue when I later merge his fix. bitbucket does that, and i would bet its quite

Fix missing References from broken muas.

2010-05-08 Thread Arvid Picciani
Most of my mail comes from the 50MLs i'm subscribed to. Unfortunately some MUAs suck that much, they don't even respond in threads. My idea how to fix them would be: $ notmuch search subject:Foo and from dou...@brokenwebmua.com thread:03ff [..] dou...@brokenwebmua.com,me Foo

Re: syncing mail by simply syncing the filesystem

2010-06-12 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:37:16 -0300, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: Well, only one place where you mark things unread as well with this approach. Otherwise updating the database in two places and attempting to sync will lead to an unmergable conflict, won't it? Oh yeah, sorry. I'm assuming

Kill Thread

2010-06-18 Thread Arvid Picciani
Anyone got an idea how to add a kill-thread feature? I get a few dozens of emails a day, of which most are just responses to threads i dont care about anyway. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-14 Thread Arvid Picciani
Hi, how do you add new mails to the index? manual says "notmuch new" should be enough, but it simply says "No new mail." on the first run (when no .notmuch is there yet), it finds some messages, but doesn't index them either. $ notmuch search tag:inbox $ $ notmuch search s $ -- Arvid

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-14 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:38:00 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote: > on the first run (when no .notmuch is there yet), it finds some > messages, but doesn't index them either. the offending commit is 2c4555f1a56602ff1dd55a63699810522ba4d91e from readdir (3): "Currently, only some f

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-15 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:47:10 +0200, Dirk-Jan C. Binnema wrote: > I take a slighly different approach in mu: works for me, thanks Dirk. patch against HEAD is attached ( i hope. i'm new to emacs mail :D ) It takes around half an hour for my 60K mail on reiserfs, but it did take 10 minutes

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 07:09 AM, Carl Worth wrote: > Your original patch was sent as "application/octet-stream" which made it > awkward to read, (I would have to manually save it rather than just > being able to read it within emacs with notmuch). uum yeah thanks. I'll try to figure out how this works.

[notmuch] indexing mail?

2010-01-23 Thread Arvid Picciani
On 01/23/2010 03:29 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote: >>> done >> >> I'm still not sure what is slow for you, > > scanning 60k mails. :D That's not fixable, other then by not doing that. > > but I'm also not sure how the above would help. > > It doesn't scan all 6

[notmuch] [PATCHv2] Preserve folder information when indexing

2010-02-02 Thread Arvid Picciani
It's all the dots fault. it works just fine with folders not beginning with . On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > I'm going back to my original > suggestion, which was that the configuration should state tag that > should be added for messages in certain folders.

[notmuch] What's so great about notmuch?

2010-02-28 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:08:49 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: >What's your favorite thing about notmuch? It's the only email index that respects unix ideas, and hence the only usable to me. It doesn't do _everything_ but limits itself to indexing, while doing a great job at that. That's how

bug tracking

2010-04-26 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:31:05 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > For example, if dme commits a fix and marks "issue #217 closed" with > that fix, then I'd like my repository of bugs to also know to close that > issue when I later merge his fix. bitbucket does that, and i would bet its quite a common

Fix missing References from broken muas.

2010-05-08 Thread Arvid Picciani
Most of my mail comes from the 50MLs i'm subscribed to. Unfortunately some MUAs suck that much, they don't even respond in threads. My idea how to fix them would be: $ notmuch search subject:Foo and from douche at brokenwebmua.com thread:03ff [..] douche at brokenwebmua.com,me

syncing mail by simply syncing the filesystem

2010-06-12 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:13:07 +0200, Christoph Groth wrote: > The ideal setup would be one which would allow to use any of my > computers independently (for example when I'm away with my laptop). > When necessary, the local mail stores would be synchronized by simply > syncing the home directory

syncing mail by simply syncing the filesystem

2010-06-12 Thread Arvid Picciani
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:37:16 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Well, only one place where you mark things unread as well with this > approach. Otherwise updating the database in two places and attempting > to sync will lead to an unmergable conflict, won't it? Oh yeah, sorry. I'm assuming "unison"

Kill Thread

2010-06-18 Thread Arvid Picciani
Anyone got an idea how to add a kill-thread feature? I get a few dozens of emails a day, of which most are just responses to threads i dont care about anyway.