Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags)

2010-01-20 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org [2010.01.14.2112 +1300]: Sure. But the MDA doesn't need to do the commit immediately. Since (presumably) we're using Maildir, the MDA on the mail receiving server is going to generate filenames

[notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags)

2010-01-14 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote: > If the MDA delivers to Git, then potentially, you might get into a > situation where you cannot write your own changes back to the repo. This > is also a DoS scenario: I'll just keep sending you e-mail, and if I > manage to pass your mail filters,

[notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags)

2010-01-21 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.14.2112 +1300]: >> Sure. But the MDA doesn't need to do the commit immediately. Since >> (presumably) we're using Maildir, the MDA on the mail receiving >> server is going to generate filen

[notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail)

2010-01-25 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.21.1928 > +1300]: >>> I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP server >>> side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone, and that >>> me