moves done by other clients,
by using filename lookups to avoid accessing and parsing the mail
files themselves.
I should re-iterate that I'm new to notmuch, and it's obvious that I'm
trying to beat it into becoming something it was never intended to be;
on the other hand, I'd like people to chim
o
> address that.
Thanks for your consideration; on the other hand, I do think that it
is a good idea not to make matters more complex than they need to be,
so I can certainly sympathise with the principles you've set for this
project.
regards,
Michiel Buddingh'
actices for storing Maildirs on (V)FAT.
I've used only this file as a reference.
http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
mvg,
Michiel Buddingh'
y box and going through the outstanding mails shows me that
> Michiel Buddingh has a more complete patch on the
> convert-maildir-flags-into-tags issue which Carl has tagged for review. Will
> wait what comes out of it and if anything is left for me to. :)
Apologies. In my haste to cover u
== MAILDIR) {
> > + char * leaf = basename(next);
>
> You could save the basename call by examining the leaf name when it is
> available as a standalone string up in the caller.
Which would require testing with S_ISDIR twice, which is uglier, but
essentially free, so I'll grant it's the better thing to do.
> So this patch is close, but needs a few fixes.
I'll be happy to implement them, although I'd like for others to chime
in on the configure-as-Maildir vs. autodetect-Maildir issue. And thanks
for your patience in working through my patch.
--
Michiel Buddingh'
First of all, apologies for taking so long to get back to this.
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Carl Worth wrote:
> The auto-detection is just three additional stats (at most) for each
> directory, right? That seems cheap enough to me.
If that's cheap enough, then I won't disagree with auto-detection.
l
daemon.
Just the mailid and path would be enough for people to implement their
own tagging based on directory, Maildir flags or (for all I care)
Bayesian content filtering with relative ease.
Just a thought
--
Michiel Buddingh'
