Hi all,
First of all, *immense respect* to each and every one of you for making
the legendary MUA-hopper stopper a reality! Emacs has been aching for
this for a *very* long time.
Much to my misfortune, I discovered Notmuch merely a year ago (after
declaring sup a rather unflatteringly executed
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:00:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
However, when moving files into another folder and rerunning notmuch
new, the folder value is never updated, it seems.
This appears to occur only when searching with a single-word folder
path.
---
---
emacs/notmuch-wash.el |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-wash.el b/emacs/notmuch-wash.el
index c4a7a41..0e64eb2 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-wash.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-wash.el
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ is what to put on the button.
(let*
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
With my current setup (implying that it might be already possible with
notmuch but I am not aware how), when sending a message it is put in
/home/cfl/mail/sent via Fcc.
This can be configured with the variable
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:23:46 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
With 60k messages and 12k tagged as sent:
$ time notmuch tag +sent -- from:f...@chaoflow.net
real 0m8.561s
user 0m8.069s
sys 0m0.212s
$ time notmuch tag +sent -- from:f...@chaoflow.net and not tag:sent
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:15:00 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:26:46 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, folks. I just pushed a couple of patches to my crypto branch [0]
that add support for auto-tagging of
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:02:45 -0700, Mueen Nawaz mu...@nawaz.org wrote:
I think you misunderstood me. A part of me suspects this has something
to do with my not explaining myself, but who's to say?G
Same here, apparently :D
I'm experimenting with notmuch, and if I can translate everything I
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:28:00 +0100, Andreas Amann a.am...@ucc.ie wrote:
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:23:17 +0100, Andreas Amann a.am...@ucc.ie wrote:
since commit 44d3c57e (emacs: Display any unexpected output from notmuch
search) I see a number of messages of the form
Error: Unexpected
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:17:40 -0400, Tom Prince tom.pri...@ualberta.net wrote:
On 2011-04-17, Pieter Praet wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:23:44 -0400, Tom Prince tom.pri...@ualberta.net
wrote:
Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a
WAITING tag (or similar
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:47:25 +0300, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@verdurent.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering how developers on this list handle the case of grabbing
a patch series posted to the list and using something like git-am to
apply it to their local trees.
See
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:36:45 +0200, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote:
Sounds logical in theory, but in practice, you'll soon get stuck
spamming npppnwtf in the search field.
That, and TAB/S-TAB feels more natural.
More natural than what exactly ? [...]
More natural than
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:26:26 -0700, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:16:32 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
This enables the proper face customization UI for
notmuch-search-line-faces.
Hey, folks. amdragon was the
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:14:52 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
as time goes, notmuch is really becoming slower and slower. It may be
normal as it has more and more messages to track but I am not sure it
is that normal give these numbers:
- notmuch version: notmuch
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:18:52 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
[...]
Is this the switch from xapian 1.0.x to 1.2.x or are further steps
necessary?
Are there instructions on how to do the switch? For the mailing list
archive a link would be great - a quick search for 'xapian
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:31:09 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:59:34 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:23:46 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net
wrote:
With 60k messages and 12k tagged as sent
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:10:45 +0100, Andreas Amann a.am...@ucc.ie wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:24:16 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:28:00 +0100, Andreas Amann a.am...@ucc.ie wrote:
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:23:17 +0100, Andreas Amann a.am
On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:42:39 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Arg. One last bit of churn.
dkg found a bug in the new sanitize_string function that was causing
segfaults on messages with empty headers. This is obviously an imprtant
thing to fix.
After
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:44:14 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:00:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
However, when moving files into another folder and rerunning notmuch
new, the folder value is never updated, it seems.
This appears
On Thu, 12 May 2011 09:18:48 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
The atomicity tests were failing here because I didn't have GDB
installed, so I've added it as a prereq.
Sorry, I've had a patch to address
When moving mail to a different folder, there appear to be residual
incorrect folder: terms.
This test exposes an existing bug, so is currently failing.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/search-by-folder |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
test_expect_equal* tests [2]
- [PATCH] test: Report test failures from test_expect_* [3]
Pieter Praet (4):
test: add 'GDB' prereq to 'atomicity' tests
test: add 'GPG' prereq to 'crypto' tests
test: add 'Emacs' prereq to 'emacs' tests
test: add 'Emacs' prereq to 'emacs-large-search-buffer
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/atomicity | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/atomicity b/test/atomicity
index cd58c4c..78280b2 100755
--- a/test/atomicity
+++ b/test/atomicity
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ test_description='atomicity
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/crypto | 30 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/crypto b/test/crypto
index 961d035..c2f381c 100755
--- a/test/crypto
+++ b/test/crypto
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@
test_description='PGP
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/emacs | 40 +++-
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/emacs b/test/emacs
index 3264bf2..011deac 100755
--- a/test/emacs
+++ b/test/emacs
@@ -2,6 +2,12 @@
test_description
-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
emacs/notmuch-message.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-message.el b/emacs/notmuch-message.el
index d5c96c2..c8b19c3 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-message.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-message.el
@@ -47,6 +47,6
Renamed subtest Reply within emacs to Compose reply in emacs as it
doesn't really do a reply, but rather populates a reply buffer and
then princ's it.
... and couldn't possibly justify that without writing an actual reply test.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/emacs | 33
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/emacs |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/emacs b/test/emacs
index 18d8322..c0fba52 100755
--- a/test/emacs
+++ b/test/emacs
@@ -142,6 +142,10 @@ On Fri, 29 Mar 1974 10:00:00 -, Notmuch Test
Renamed 'notmuch-message-mark-replied' to 'notmuch-message-mod-tags'.
Previously (semi)hardcoded vars are now to be provided as arguments,
allowing much more flexibility re autotagging in message-mode.
Paving the way towards proper draft handling?
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
Rebased the set test prereqs (Emacs, GDB, GPG) [1] patch series
to Jameson's release-candidate/0.6 branch (0c0b4172).
The GDB dependency for the atomicity tests was dropped since
Austin has already included this in his amdragon/atomic-new-v4
branch [2], which has been included in
Adds a new test that checks for the presence of 'gpg',
and adds that test as a prereq to all subsequent tests
that rely on GnuPG.
This causes tests with unmet dependencies to be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/crypto | 33 +++--
1
Adds a new test that checks for the presence of 'emacs',
and adds that test as a prereq to all subsequent tests
that rely on Emacs.
This causes tests with unmet dependencies to be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/crypto | 17 ++---
1 files changed, 14
Adds a new test that checks for the presence of 'emacs',
and adds that test as a prereq to all subsequent tests
that rely on Emacs.
This causes tests with unmet dependencies to be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/emacs | 43
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:53:37 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:43:01 +0200, Sebastien Binet seb.bi...@gmail.com
wrote:
You didn't try forwarding the email to the list ;)
ah!
Various typo fixes in docs, docstrings, comments, etc...
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
Rebased to current master (12d6f90e)
NEWS | 10 +-
TODO |4 ++--
compat/README|2 +-
completion/Makefile
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:22:27 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:14:21 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Various typo fixes in docs, docstrings, comments, etc...
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
Thanks
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:15:25 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
[...] I'm going
to skip the typo fixes for 0.6, unless convinced otherwise.
Well, the whole point of my de-typo-ifying sprint was to make 0.6 a
~typo-free
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:50:47 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
This looks great (modulo one bug, below). I've wanted to run the
tests on tmpfs before, but was too lazy to actually fix the tests.
Given how easy it is to accidentally use .., I wonder if there's a
way to force
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:34:02 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
Hey, folks. As of today I am for some reason no longer able to build
the Notmuch Debian package. I'm using the same build technique I have
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:12:24 -0600, Mark Anderson ma.sk...@gmail.com wrote:
Test for bug. Current stemming support for notmuch adds extra terms
to the DB which aren't removed when the file renames are detected.
When folder tags are added to a message, Xapian terms for both XFOLDER
and
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:00:41 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:57:50 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:18:52 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote:
A race condition in the '*' command was noted
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:17:27 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
You however, seem to be incredibly disciplined in this respect,
so statistically speaking, you're destined to become
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:00:53 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:34:44 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
notmuch tag -inbox +draft -- folder:${where_your_drafts_reside}
My notmuch help does not mention folder:, and indeed folder:drafts as a
search
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:31:26 -0400, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote:
[SNIP] It
would be nice, however, if the emacs interface supported hiding tags
matching certain patterns (say /\..+/).
This should be possible as of last month (eb4e0ea2),
by courtesy of Daniel Schoepe [1].
- Ben
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:03:00 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:11:32 -0600, Mark Anderson ma.sk...@gmail.com wrote:
Change add_email_corpus, emacs_deliver_message and tests to use
$TEST_DIRECTORY
:
PASS Message with .. in Message-Id:
instead of:
PASS Message with .. in Message-Id:
PASS Sending a message via (fake) SMTP
The second one is simply the insertion of a line break, so no harm there.
This commit reverts both changes, as they were clearly accidental.
Signed-off-by: Pieter
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:19:44 -0600, Mark Anderson ma.sk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:40 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:21:11 -0600, Mark Anderson ma.sk...@gmail.com
wrote:
I personally prefer --output=files remain
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:40:07 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:04:23 +1000, Brian May
br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote:
On 30 June 2011 08:40, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
The 'a'
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:53:03 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/alternative
I've spent embarrassingly little time in the emacs UI, so my opinions on
this should be taken lightly, but I feel like all of the bindings are of the
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:31:32 +, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
Add a pseudo tag that matches all the messages that have no tags. Add new
customization option notmuch-tags-nomatch to enable and name the pseudo
tag.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 18 --
1 files
it faster than Windoze can BSOD),
but the patch will be so huge and disruptive that even Ubuntu devs might
consider frowning disapprovingly.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
notmuch-search.c |4 ++--
1 files
Alter `do_search_tags()' to prepend each result with `tag:',
and update affected test.
This makes its output consistent with `do_search_threads()' and
`do_search_messages()'.
See this discussion: id:871v6b79s0@yoom.home.cworth.org
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
notmuch
of 1.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 6685717..a703732 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
@@ -858,6
Should provide full test coverage of the stashing feature.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/emacs| 41 +
test/emacs.expected-output/emacs-stashing |9 ++
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:50:27 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
[...]
And AFAIK, Archive does *not* mark a message as read in GMail.
(see previous messages suggesting the inverse [...]
... be implemented in Notmuch.
[...] )
Nobody claimed the inverse was the case in GMail, so I
This test is meant solely to make sure my next patch
doesn't break anything (in an obvious way, at least).
In other words: it does *not* demonstrate a race condition issue.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
Robin,
Could you provide a test to expose the actual race condition
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:24:12 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:19:49 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Alter `do_search_threads()' and `do_search_messages()'
to not prepend each result with `thread:' respectively `id
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:08:28 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
`notmuch-search-operate-all' may cause a race condition because
repeatedly running `notmuch-tag' with the *original* query string
makes the result list a moving target.
One approach to resolving this, is to feed
of the latter itself.
See discussion @ id:86d3i1d06r@dragonfly.greenrd.org
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
Carl,
I've gone along a different route which assures only matched messages
are touched, but it does come with quite a performance hit.
Since there isn't a test
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:26:48 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:40:07 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
not sure why notmuch reply is putting that there :)
The
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:28:10 +1000, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
wrote:
On 30 June 2011 17:50, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
And AFAIK, Archive does *not* mark a message as read in GMail.
(see previous messages suggesting the inverse)
gmail will mark all messages
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 02:23:34 +0100, Andreas Amann a.am...@ucc.ie wrote:
It's a known problem. As a short term fix, try the patches of
id:1307320169-29905-1-git-send-email-jroll...@finestructure.net
Or use `notmuch-show-view-raw-message' (bound to 'V').
thanks a lot David. I can
---
Either enable `notmuch-always-prompt-for-sender', or apply this
quick-fix patch, which uses `name' and `primary_email' as configured
in your .notmuch-config if aforementioned isn't enabled.
emacs/notmuch-mua.el |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Thanks Austin!
Unfortunately, your patch causes *all* Message-Id's in the thread to be
appended, as opposed to only the ones matching the query:
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
$ notmuch search tag:inbox AND from:amdra...@mit.edu
thread:2777 Yest. 19:17 [1/3] Austin Clements| Pieter Praet;
[PATCH 2
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
emacs/notmuch.el |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index f11ec24..674deb7 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch.el
@@ -801,13 +801,14 @@ non-authors is found
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 14 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index 2338044..46e276a 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch.el
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ For a mouse
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/emacs-search-operate-all | 29 +
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 test/emacs-search-operate-all
diff --git a/test/emacs-search-operate-all b/test/emacs-search-operate-all
new
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
emacs/notmuch.el |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index 46e276a..0d040a2 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch.el
@@ -869,7 +869,10 @@ Each character
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:47:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very convenient when C-e (bound to `widget-end-of-line') ignores
trailing spaces inside the search widget. But it only does so if a
widget is not followed by a newline (that is why it works in the
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:37:06 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:24:17 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:47:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very convenient when C-e (bound
Besides, nobody commented on it except a noob like myself.
Just by keeping half an eye on all that gets merged, imagining what
a maintainer's job must be like sends shivers down my spine.
^ The following was sent in true top-posting style, for your personal
bewilderment. Please stand on
-message-extent)
(defun notmuch-show-message-top ()
(car (notmuch-show-message-extent)))
--
1.7.5.4
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:08:43 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:55:21 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 12:27:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very convenient when C-e (bound
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:20:25 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:58:24 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote:
Some time after upgrading to notmuch 0.6, notmuch new suddenly started
failing, with this backtrace: (this is on DragonFly BSD)
Program
).
Can't think of a use case for non-matched messages right now,
but if required, we'll just use `set-exclusive-or'.
--
Sent from my Android. Please excuse my brevity.
Tip: K-9 Mail [1], apart from being much better than the stock email client,
supports bottom-posting :)
Pieter Praet pie
-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
Fantastic usability improvement Daniel!
Peace
--
Pieter
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Some tagging-related tests and a (soon to be deprecated) bugfix,
which should be merged in *before* the (upcoming) race condition
patch series [1], to prevent surprises of the non-enjoyable kind.
Peace
--
Pieter
[1] id:CAH-f9WticM4EN8F1_ik_-mcBcBtrXwSpO+Drbtp7=un7mce...@mail.gmail.com
`notmuch-search-operate-all' (bound to *) adds and removes tags
to/from all messages which match the query used to populate the
current search buffer.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
---
test/emacs-search-operate-all | 29 +
test/notmuch-test
In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' (+/-),
`notmuch-search-operate-all' (*) should operate on matching threads
instead of matching messages.
This test exposes an existing bug, so is currently failing.
It should be fixed in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:05:32 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jul 11 at 10:43 pm:
TL;DR: I can haz regex pl0x?
Oof, what a pain. I'm happy to change the output format of search; I
hadn't realized how difficult it would be to parse. In fact, I'm
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:37:52 -0400, Jason Woofenden ja...@jasonwoof.com wrote:
I added tag:me to all messages from me.
Then I added this to my index page:
tag:notmuch and tag:unread and tag:me
So my attention could be drawn to threads I'd participated in,
which had new messages. (This
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:26:04 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
[SNIP]
The Notmuch project is in the unique position of being the product of
Carl's (legimitate) dislike of email (see his talk @ LCA2011 [1]), so
it's safe to say patches may take some time to pass the gatekeeper.
Don't
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:57:21 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jul 13 at 4:16 pm:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:05:32 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu
wrote:
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jul 11 at 10:43 pm:
TL;DR: I can haz regex pl0x?
Oof, what
Rebased to current master.
Previous version:
id:1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org
Discussion:
id:1317660447-27520-1-git-send-email-schno...@schnouki.net
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Adds a new test that checks for the presence of 'gpg',
and adds that test as a prereq to all subsequent tests
that rely on GnuPG.
This causes tests with unmet dependencies to be skipped.
---
test/crypto | 33 +++--
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Adds a new test that checks for the presence of 'emacs',
and adds that test as a prereq to all subsequent tests
that rely on Emacs.
This causes tests with unmet dependencies to be skipped.
---
test/crypto | 17 ++---
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
Adds a new test that checks for the presence of 'emacs',
and adds that test as a prereq to all subsequent tests
that rely on Emacs.
This causes tests with unmet dependencies to be skipped.
---
test/emacs | 65 ---
1 files changed, 35
Adds a new test that checks for the presence of 'emacs',
and adds that test as a prereq to all subsequent tests
that rely on Emacs.
This causes tests with unmet dependencies to be skipped.
---
test/emacs-large-search-buffer |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
:
242/247 tests passed.
2 broken tests failed as expected.
3 tests failed.
(The 3 failed tests come from some trouble with Emacs 24, I'll try to fix this
later.)
*Many* thanks to Dmitry Kurochkin and Pieter Praet for their work!
Thanks to you as well! All this duplication of effort
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:47:17 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
[...]
The SCREEN prereq would preferrably be added in a separate commit.
Also, you appear to have given *every* test the EMACS+GPG prereq,
while only the ones using `emacs_deliver_message' require EMACS.
Peace
--
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:47:18 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
[...]
Nice catches @
- Sending a message via (fake) SMTP
- Hiding message following HTML part
(though I think the latter test wasn't there yet when I submitted my
patch series)
New issues:
- The SCREEN prereq
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:18:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:49:03 +0200, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 20:33:00 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
To allow for expansion whilst keeping everything
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:57:59 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:47:18 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
[...]
- @ Verify that sent messages are saved/searchable (via FCC):
This doesn't need an EMACS prereq.
[...]
My mistake, scrap
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:56:17 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:47:17 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
[...]
Also, you appear to have given *every* test the EMACS+GPG prereq,
while only the ones using `emacs_deliver_message' require EMACS
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:17:51 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:49:11 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
-test_expect_success 'emacs delivery of signed message' \
+test_expect_success GPG 'emacs delivery of signed message' \
Hi
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 22:20:25 +0200, Ali Polatel pola...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 08:49:10PM +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
Rebased to current master.
Previous version:
id:1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org
Discussion:
id:1317660447-27520-1-git-send-email
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:59:49 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:26:46 +0200, Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name
wrote:
This new test currently fails -- but it shouldn't.
---
Hi!
I found this while manually copying directories and running notmuch
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:03:50 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch adds a test to check that json show format includes
filenames for attachments with inline disposition.
---
Carl, I owe you this test case for my patch that added filenames
for inline
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:46:44 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:38:26 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
Emacs 23.2 queries by default about killing existing processes. This
is annoying when one wants to interrupt long search
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 12:17:36 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
This is a rebase and cleanup of Istvan Marko's patch from
id:m3pqnj2j7a@zsu.kismala.com
Fantastic performance improvement Austin! This should be merged in ASAP.
BTW, compacting the db from time to time also has
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:09:17 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:17:37 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:22:17 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
From: Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi
dtach
1 - 100 of 658 matches
Mail list logo
