[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sat, Jan 03 2015, "W. Trevor King" wrote: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: >> At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more >> "obvious". This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a >> big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the bottom

[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > I'd presume anyone else using such an old system will have bigger > problems getting their notmuch compiled (recent enough zlib being one > of those), so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone > needing rst2man there (besides me, of course :) I guess the

[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread David Bremner
From: "W. Trevor King" Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a *.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script. This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up

[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread Tomi Ollila
From: W. Trevor King Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a *.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script. This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up

[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 07:12:13PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > ? so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone needing > rst2man there? Requiring Sphinx >= 1.0 (2010-07-23 [1]) to build man pages is fine with me. Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Sphinx/1.0 -- This

[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: > At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more > "obvious". This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a > big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the bottom of every iteration of the > for loop. Also conform

[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread Tomi Ollila
From: W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a *.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script. This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up

[PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread David Bremner
From: W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a *.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script. This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up

Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more obvious. This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the bottom of every iteration of the for loop. Also conform a bit

Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sat, Jan 03 2015, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more obvious. This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the

Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

2015-01-03 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes: I'd presume anyone else using such an old system will have bigger problems getting their notmuch compiled (recent enough zlib being one of those), so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone needing rst2man there (besides me, of course :) I