v6:
- Rebased to current master (be851ad3).
- Broke test out into a separate commit.
v5:
- id:"1327907574-12760-1-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
- id:"1327907574-12760-2-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
v4:
- id:"1327653866-30084-1-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
v3:
-
v6:
- Rebased to current master (be851ad3).
- Broke test out into a separate commit.
v5:
- id:1327907574-12760-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org
- id:1327907574-12760-2-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org
v4:
- id:1327653866-30084-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org
v3:
-
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:36:40 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:42:23 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:40:26 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > In general, I like this.
> > >
> > > - I think that the stash function(s) should take an optional argument
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:36:40 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:42:23 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:40:26 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
In general, I like this.
- I think that the stash
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:42:23 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:40:26 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > In general, I like this.
> >
> > - I think that the stash function(s) should take an optional argument
> > specifying the archive to use. That will make testing simpler and
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:40:26 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> In general, I like this.
>
> - I think that the stash function(s) should take an optional argument
> specifying the archive to use. That will make testing simpler and also
> allow people to produce preferred bindings more easily.
>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:40:26 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
In general, I like this.
- I think that the stash function(s) should take an optional argument
specifying the archive to use. That will make testing simpler and also
allow people to produce preferred bindings more
In general, I like this.
- I think that the stash function(s) should take an optional argument
specifying the archive to use. That will make testing simpler and also
allow people to produce preferred bindings more easily.
- "Message archive: " feels better than "ML Archive: ", but I don't
---
Depends on id:"1327397873-20596-1-git-send-email-dme at dme.org"
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 55 ++--
test/emacs|2 +-
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:50:08 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > In a perfect world, everyone would be using Notmuch and have a local
> > copy of every message ever sent to any ML. While we're waiting for
> > Atlantis to resurface, we'll
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:00:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> [...]
> So, 'completing-read' -- or something that does the same thing better (ymmv).
>
Thanks for the suggestion, but `completing-read' will do just fine... ;D
> Tomi
Peace
--
Pieter
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:00:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
[...]
So, 'completing-read' -- or something that does the same thing better (ymmv).
Thanks for the suggestion, but `completing-read' will do just fine... ;D
Tomi
Peace
--
Pieter
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:50:08 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
In a perfect world, everyone would be using Notmuch and have a local
copy of every message ever sent to any ML. While we're waiting for
Atlantis
---
Depends on id:1327397873-20596-1-git-send-email-...@dme.org
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 55 ++--
test/emacs|2 +-
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index
In general, I like this.
- I think that the stash function(s) should take an optional argument
specifying the archive to use. That will make testing simpler and also
allow people to produce preferred bindings more easily.
- Message archive: feels better than ML Archive: , but I don't
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:41:26 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:18:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > >
> > > Your point about Gmane not having everything applies equally to any
> > > service, suggesting that
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson wrote:
>
> Your point about Gmane not having everything applies equally to any
> service, suggesting that perhaps the user should also have an option to
> choose which service to use at stash time. Thoughts?
Completing-read which has all
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:18:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> >
> > Your point about Gmane not having everything applies equally to any
> > service, suggesting that perhaps the user should also have an option to
> > choose which service to
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:50:08 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> In a perfect world, everyone would be using Notmuch and have a local
> copy of every message ever sent to any ML. While we're waiting for
> Atlantis to resurface, we'll need an interim solution.
>
> +1 for the idea, but Gmane doesn't
In a perfect world, everyone would be using Notmuch and have a local
copy of every message ever sent to any ML. While we're waiting for
Atlantis to resurface, we'll need an interim solution.
+1 for the idea, but Gmane doesn't archive *all* MLs, so we should leave
the user some legroom. Since
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Your point about Gmane not having everything applies equally to any
service, suggesting that perhaps the user should also have an option to
choose which service to use at stash time. Thoughts?
Completing-read which has
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:18:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Your point about Gmane not having everything applies equally to any
service, suggesting that perhaps the user should also have an option to
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:41:26 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:18:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Your point about Gmane not having everything applies equally to any
`notmuch-show-stash-gmane' stashes a URI for the current message at
Gmane, presuming that Gmane has a copy of the message with the same
Message-Id.
`notmuch-show-stash-gmane-and-go' both stashes the message and opens
the relevant page in the configured browser.
Add the relevant test for
`notmuch-show-stash-gmane' stashes a URI for the current message at
Gmane, presuming that Gmane has a copy of the message with the same
Message-Id.
`notmuch-show-stash-gmane-and-go' both stashes the message and opens
the relevant page in the configured browser.
Add the relevant test for
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:50:08 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
In a perfect world, everyone would be using Notmuch and have a local
copy of every message ever sent to any ML. While we're waiting for
Atlantis to resurface, we'll need an interim solution.
+1 for the idea, but Gmane
26 matches
Mail list logo
