On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:57 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:16:08 +0100, Peter Feigl wrote:
> > The output routines have been rewritten so that logical structure
> > (objects with key/value pairs, arrays, strings and numbers) are
> > written instead of ad-hoc
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:04:07 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 21 at 10:16 pm:
> I think this is a great idea and I'm a fan of having an S-expression
> format, but I also think there's a much easier and more general way to
> structure this.
>
> In particular, I don't think
Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 22 at 12:17 am:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:04:07 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 21 at 10:16 pm:
> > I think this is a great idea and I'm a fan of having an S-expression
> > format, but I also think there's a much easier and more general way to
Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 21 at 10:16 pm:
> The output routines have been rewritten so that logical structure
> (objects with key/value pairs, arrays, strings and numbers) are
> written instead of ad-hoc printfs. This allows for easier adaptation
> of other output formats, as only the routines that
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:21:37 +0100, "Peter Feigl" wrote:
> What kind of documentation should I include?
Update the man page to describe the new format and command line options.
> The test suite should work fine, *if* it compares EXPECTED and OUTPUT
> not character-by-character, but rather by
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:16:08 +0100, Peter Feigl wrote:
> The output routines have been rewritten so that logical structure
> (objects with key/value pairs, arrays, strings and numbers) are
> written instead of ad-hoc printfs. This allows for easier adaptation
> of other output formats, as only
The output routines have been rewritten so that logical structure
(objects with key/value pairs, arrays, strings and numbers) are
written instead of ad-hoc printfs. This allows for easier adaptation
of other output formats, as only the routines that start/end an object
etc. have to be rewritten.
Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 21 at 10:16 pm:
The output routines have been rewritten so that logical structure
(objects with key/value pairs, arrays, strings and numbers) are
written instead of ad-hoc printfs. This allows for easier adaptation
of other output formats, as only the routines that
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:16:08 +0100, Peter Feigl cra...@gmx.net wrote:
The output routines have been rewritten so that logical structure
(objects with key/value pairs, arrays, strings and numbers) are
written instead of ad-hoc printfs. This allows for easier adaptation
of other output formats,
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:04:07 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 21 at 10:16 pm:
I think this is a great idea and I'm a fan of having an S-expression
format, but I also think there's a much easier and more general way to
structure this.
In particular, I
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:57 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:16:08 +0100, Peter Feigl cra...@gmx.net wrote:
The output routines have been rewritten so that logical structure
(objects with key/value pairs, arrays, strings and numbers) are
Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 22 at 12:17 am:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:04:07 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Peter Feigl on Jan 21 at 10:16 pm:
I think this is a great idea and I'm a fan of having an S-expression
format, but I also think there's a much easier and more general
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:21:37 +0100, Peter Feigl cra...@gmx.net wrote:
What kind of documentation should I include?
Update the man page to describe the new format and command line options.
The test suite should work fine, *if* it compares EXPECTED and OUTPUT
not character-by-character, but
13 matches
Mail list logo
