Jani Nikula writes:
> Clearly broken. This series fixes the issue at the cli
> level. (Forbidding empty tags at the lib level is slightly more
> complicated, as we would still have to ensure old dump files can be
> restored.)
pushed, with the 4th fixup patch.
d
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
Clearly broken. This series fixes the issue at the cli
level. (Forbidding empty tags at the lib level is slightly more
complicated, as we would still have to ensure old dump files can be
restored.)
pushed, with the 4th fixup patch.
d
On Sun, Feb 23 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Rob Browning wrote:
>> In the [new] section, "tags=;" will cause notmuch to create empty tags
>> that are fairly hard to remove from the command line.
>
> Clearly broken. This series fixes the issue at the cli
> level. (Forbidding
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Rob Browning wrote:
> In the [new] section, "tags=;" will cause notmuch to create empty tags
> that are fairly hard to remove from the command line.
Clearly broken. This series fixes the issue at the cli
level. (Forbidding empty tags at the lib level is slightly more
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote:
In the [new] section, tags=; will cause notmuch to create empty tags
that are fairly hard to remove from the command line.
Clearly broken. This series fixes the issue at the cli
level. (Forbidding empty tags at the lib level is
On Sun, Feb 23 2014, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote:
In the [new] section, tags=; will cause notmuch to create empty tags
that are fairly hard to remove from the command line.
Clearly broken. This series fixes the issue at the
