Quoth Jani Nikula on Jul 10 at 8:10 am:
>On Jul 10, 2012 4:49 AM, "Austin Clements" <[1]amdragon at mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Quoth Jani Nikula on Jun 15 at ?6:53 pm:
>> > Add no-display arg to notmuch-hello-refresh-hook to allow each hook to
>> > decide what is appropriate when
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jul 10 at 8:10 am:
On Jul 10, 2012 4:49 AM, Austin Clements [1]amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jun 15 at 6:53 pm:
Add no-display arg to notmuch-hello-refresh-hook to allow each hook to
decide what is appropriate when no-display is t,
On Jul 10, 2012 4:49 AM, "Austin Clements" wrote:
>
> Quoth Jani Nikula on Jun 15 at 6:53 pm:
> > Add no-display arg to notmuch-hello-refresh-hook to allow each hook to
> > decide what is appropriate when no-display is t, which is typically
> > the case when called non-interactively. This is
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jun 15 at 6:53 pm:
> Add no-display arg to notmuch-hello-refresh-hook to allow each hook to
> decide what is appropriate when no-display is t, which is typically
> the case when called non-interactively. This is used by the following
> patch.
>
> This breaks existing hooks
On Jul 10, 2012 4:49 AM, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jun 15 at 6:53 pm:
Add no-display arg to notmuch-hello-refresh-hook to allow each hook to
decide what is appropriate when no-display is t, which is typically
the case when called non-interactively. This
Add no-display arg to notmuch-hello-refresh-hook to allow each hook to
decide what is appropriate when no-display is t, which is typically
the case when called non-interactively. This is used by the following
patch.
This breaks existing hooks people might have, which will now need to
accept the
