On Thu, May 30 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Yes, it does fix notmuch reply as well. Do you think that we should
> augment the test suite to include 'notmuch reply' too?
I mean, more tests don't hurt, but I don't see it as critical. I think
it could be as simple as (please verify):
test_b
On Thu 2019-05-30 02:09:47 +, Rollins, Jameson wrote:
> On Wed, May 29 2019, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> When showing a message that has been mangled in transit by an MTA in
>>> the "Mixed up" way, "notmuch show" should instead show the
On Wed, May 29 2019, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Tue, May 28 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> When showing a message that has been mangled in transit by an MTA in
>> the "Mixed up" way, "notmuch show" should instead show the repaired
>> form of the message.
>
> Given that this fix is in
On Tue, May 28 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> When showing a message that has been mangled in transit by an MTA in
> the "Mixed up" way, "notmuch show" should instead show the repaired
> form of the message.
Given that this fix is in mime-node.c it will apply to reply as well,
not just show,
When showing a message that has been mangled in transit by an MTA in
the "Mixed up" way, "notmuch show" should instead show the repaired
form of the message.
Tracking the repaired GMimeObject for the lifetime of the mime_node so
that it is cleaned up properly is probably the trickiest part of this
