On Tue, Feb 24 2015, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27 2015, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>>> Use the new notmuch address command to do completion for addresses in
>>> from: and to:.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This patch is more of an RFC. The to: completion is
On Tue, Jan 27 2015, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Use the new notmuch address command to do completion for addresses in
> from: and to:.
>
> ---
>
> This patch is more of an RFC. The to: completion is slw because
> typically there are more matches to begin with, and then producing the
> results
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27 2015, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> Use the new notmuch address command to do completion for addresses in
>> from: and to:.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch is more of an RFC. The to: completion is slw because
>> typically there are more matches
On Tue, Jan 27 2015, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
Use the new notmuch address command to do completion for addresses in
from: and to:.
---
This patch is more of an RFC. The to: completion is slw because
typically there are more matches to begin with, and then producing the
Use the new notmuch address command to do completion for addresses in
from: and to:.
---
This patch is more of an RFC. The to: completion is slw because
typically there are more matches to begin with, and then producing the
results requires reading the messages. Maybe it would be better to
Use the new notmuch address command to do completion for addresses in
from: and to:.
---
This patch is more of an RFC. The to: completion is slw because
typically there are more matches to begin with, and then producing the
results requires reading the messages. Maybe it would be better to
