On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:06:24AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> Yes. I've got a series of about 20 commits reworking the internals a
> bit, and then one patch past that that I still need to break down into
> several clean commits.
Carl, that's really great to hear. Thanks so much for the response.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:06:24AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
Yes. I've got a series of about 20 commits reworking the internals a
bit, and then one patch past that that I still need to break down into
several clean commits.
Carl, that's really great to hear. Thanks so much for the response.
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:20:38 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
>
> >You may have to wrap your "notmuch new" call in a "notmuch save",
> >"notmuch restore" pair if you discover things coming back to your
> >inbox
>
> do you mean "notmuch dump" here instead of "notmuch save"?
Yes, sorry.
> I'm
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:12:09 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>You may have to wrap your "notmuch new" call in a "notmuch save",
>"notmuch restore" pair if you discover things coming back to your inbox.
do you mean "notmuch dump" here instead of "notmuch save"?
> The whole
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:21:15 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hey, folks. I was wondering if there was an update on getting support
> for mail deleting and moving/renaming into notmuch. I wanted to try to
> push on it a little bit since I believe that support for deleting/moving
> messages
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:12:09 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:21:15 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Hey, folks. I was wondering if there was an update on getting support
> > for mail deleting and moving/renaming into notmuch. I wanted to try to
>
Hey, folks. I was wondering if there was an update on getting support
for mail deleting and moving/renaming into notmuch. I wanted to try to
push on it a little bit since I believe that support for deleting/moving
messages is the most important outstanding issue at the moment.
I finally got
