Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-11 Thread Sandra Snan
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:24:01 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > In id:4b9d4e24.0f67f10a.31e3.adf7 at mx.google.com, Sandra asked for > something like: notmuch search not threads:( from:me and position:last ) Naw, actually I forgot to follow that up. I was looking for it to work it already worked,

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Mark Anderson wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth wrote: > > Of course, it's the same set-theoretic operation I described earlier. I > > want the set of threads having messages matching: > > > > tag:notmuch and > > > > intersected with the set of

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-09, Carl Worth wrote: > > Here's the current list: Having such a list is great. So now we need to get you a key-binding that says, "take query xy results and stuff them into the wiki" (or some pastebin like service with a fixed URL). Looking forward to 0.2. Sebastian (THanks to the

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:23, Carl Worth wrote: > 3. Ability to easily post search results to a web page. Isn't that a job for "noneatall" [0] -- maybe it just needs the ability to export to static pages, that can be rsync'ed somewhere? [0] http://github.com/dme/noneatall > 4. Fancy support

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-09, Carl Worth wrote: Here's the current list: Having such a list is great. So now we need to get you a key-binding that says, take query xy results and stuff them into the wiki (or some pastebin like service with a fixed URL). Looking forward to 0.2. Sebastian (THanks to the

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Mark Anderson wrote: On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Of course, it's the same set-theoretic operation I described earlier. I want the set of threads having messages matching: tag:notmuch and date-range intersected with

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Sandra Snan
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:24:01 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: In id:4b9d4e24.0f67f10a.31e3.a...@mx.google.com, Sandra asked for something like: notmuch search not threads:( from:me and position:last ) Naw, actually I forgot to follow that up. I was looking for it to work it

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Mark Anderson
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:23:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > For my merge window, I also want something that can't be obtained > > today. I want to see all threads that contain at least one message > > that matches my date range

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:23:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > For my merge window, I also want something that can't be obtained > today. I want to see all threads that contain at least one message > that matches my date range and at least one message that doesn't > have the "merged"

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
I want to figure out how to make a release process that will work for notmuch. An idea I have now is to use a date-based "merge window" during which features are nominated for the release. So I took a window starting at my original request for 0.2 features until now. In our current (lame) syntax

Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
I want to figure out how to make a release process that will work for notmuch. An idea I have now is to use a date-based merge window during which features are nominated for the release. So I took a window starting at my original request for 0.2 features until now. In our current (lame) syntax

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:23, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: 3. Ability to easily post search results to a web page. Isn't that a job for noneatall [0] -- maybe it just needs the ability to export to static pages, that can be rsync'ed somewhere? [0] http://github.com/dme/noneatall 4.