On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 9:19 AM Gaute Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:24 PM Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
>
>> Hi Gaute,
>>
>> On Thu 08 Oct 2020 at 10:13 +0200, Gaute Hope wrote:
>> > I made another attempt at porting lieer to notmuch2, but I am missing
>> the
>> > get_directory method
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:24 PM Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> Hi Gaute,
>
> On Thu 08 Oct 2020 at 10:13 +0200, Gaute Hope wrote:
> > I made another attempt at porting lieer to notmuch2, but I am missing the
> > get_directory method still. Any plans to look at it?
>
> Would indeed be good to add
Hi Gaute,
On Thu 08 Oct 2020 at 10:13 +0200, Gaute Hope wrote:
> I made another attempt at porting lieer to notmuch2, but I am missing the
> get_directory method still. Any plans to look at it?
Would indeed be good to add this sometime. I'm still curious to how you
use it though to make sure we
Hi Floris and others,
I made another attempt at porting lieer to notmuch2, but I am missing the
get_directory method still. Any plans to look at it?
Regards, Gaute
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 6:14 PM Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> Hi Gaute,
>
> Thanks for trying this out!
>
> On Mon 04 Nov 2019 at
On Sat, Nov 16 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> Gaute Hope writes:
>
>>
>> By the way, it does not seem that the API is very far from the
>> previous python API. If it is close enough, perhaps it is possible to
>> get away with a bug version bump in the bindings rather than creating
>> a new
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 6:14 PM Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
>
> Hi Gaute,
>
> Thanks for trying this out!
>
> On Mon 04 Nov 2019 at 11:27 +0100, Gaute Hope wrote:
> > I just checked out the wip/cffi branch on git.notmuch.org with the
> > purpose of porting Lieer (https://github.com/gauteh/lieer).
Hi Gaute,
Thanks for trying this out!
On Mon 04 Nov 2019 at 11:27 +0100, Gaute Hope wrote:
> I just checked out the wip/cffi branch on git.notmuch.org with the
> purpose of porting Lieer (https://github.com/gauteh/lieer). There
> seems to be some missing functionality: `Database.get_directory()`
Gaute Hope writes:
>
> By the way, it does not seem that the API is very far from the
> previous python API. If it is close enough, perhaps it is possible to
> get away with a bug version bump in the bindings rather than creating
> a new package. I understand the need for a new package, but it
Hi,
I just checked out the wip/cffi branch on git.notmuch.org with the
purpose of porting Lieer (https://github.com/gauteh/lieer). There
seems to be some missing functionality: `Database.get_directory()`
specifically. I also ran into a couple of warning when building
(included below).
Thanks for
On Tue 22 Oct 2019 at 13:32 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> The LD_LIBRARY_PATH is already set by the test harness, as is PATH (to
>> find notmuch). It looks like your function notmuch is not respecting
>> PATH (see attached log). if I hack something like
>>
>> diff
David Bremner writes:
> The LD_LIBRARY_PATH is already set by the test harness, as is PATH (to
> find notmuch). It looks like your function notmuch is not respecting
> PATH (see attached log). if I hack something like
>
> diff --git a/bindings/python-cffi/tests/conftest.py
>
Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>
> It is possible to run this without installing, but it does need a build
> step since cffi (in the mode used - which is the recommended mode) needs
> to build an extension module. I did something like this, using my
> debian testing system-installed python
>
> $
On Mon 14 Oct 2019 at 09:42 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> The shim in
>> T391-python-cffi.sh doesn't work for me, it doesn't manage to set
>> PYTHONPATH so that notdb is importable.
Ah yes, I tested this shim while activating a venv with the extension
installed using
David Bremner writes:
> The shim in
> T391-python-cffi.sh doesn't work for me, it doesn't manage to set
> PYTHONPATH so that notdb is importable.
I should have mentioned that if I manually set python path with
something like
$ PYTHONPATH=`pwd`/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.7:$PYTHONPATH pytest-3
Floris Bruynooghe writes:
> IIRC this probably wants to be renamed to "notmuch2" instead of
> "notdb". Otherwise I'm pretty sure this doesn't cover all the
> current features either.
Yes, I think notmuch2 was the least disliked suggestion.
> So maybe this can be used as a start to figure out
On Tue 08 Oct 2019 at 19:24 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>> Anyway, I found the code, checked things work, updated tests on new
>> python versions, added a very basic intergration with the test
>> framework and squashed the commits. Otherwise the attached patch
>> is
Floris Bruynooghe writes:
> Anyway, I found the code, checked things work, updated tests on new
> python versions, added a very basic intergration with the test
> framework and squashed the commits. Otherwise the attached patch
> is just a plain dump of the current state so interested people
Hi all,
IIRC there was a thread in August about another attempt at bringing
the CFFI-based bindings on board as a Python3-only version. I
believe there was a desire to re-name things but my searching-fu is
failing me and I can no longer find the email thread.
Anyway, I found the code, checked
18 matches
Mail list logo
