Re: (setq notmuch-search-oldest-first nil) doesn't behave as expected

[Ryan Tate]

Ryan Tate  writes:

David Bremner  writes: 
Firmin Martin  writes:  
 For now, I can sort my email newest-first by customized the 
variable. But I would prefer to use setq if possible.  
 It's a buffer-local variable, so you should use setq-default.  
 
I don't understand anything about this reply. 


OK, setq-default restores the functionality.
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org

Re: (setq notmuch-search-oldest-first nil) doesn't behave as expected

[Ryan Tate]

David Bremner  writes:
Firmin Martin  writes: 


For now, I can sort my email newest-first by customized the 
variable. But I would prefer to use setq if possible. 


It's a buffer-local variable, so you should use setq-default. 



I don't understand anything about this reply.

1. If I don't want any of my searches to ever sort incorrectly 
(oldest first), why would it be buffer local?


2. Regardless, why did this stop working? Was it announced? What 
is the correct way to configure this?


It is frustrating to have a setup that worked for years suddenly
stop. And this isn't the only one in this upgrade, just the first one
I'm asking about.
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org

Re: (setq notmuch-search-oldest-first nil) doesn't behave as expected

[Firmin Martin]

Thanks for your reply. The question was still relevant.

David Bremner  writes:

> Firmin Martin  writes:
>
>>
>> For now, I can sort my email newest-first by customized the
>> variable. But I would prefer to use setq if possible.
>
> It's a buffer-local variable, so you should use setq-default.
> ___
> notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org