Re: [PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-28 Thread Pieter Praet
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:17:27 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
 On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
  You however, seem to be incredibly disciplined in this respect,
  so statistically speaking, you're destined to become typo-king,
  and you have every reason to be *proud* of it. :D
 
 Thanks for the compliment (even if sideways)! I enjoyed the laugh.
 
  The only thing you could possibly have to be embarrassed about,
  is insufficient laziness (which, for programmers, is considered a
  virtue) ;)
 
 And thanks as well for the gentle chiding. I hope to benefit from it.

I hope so as well.

I mean, it's okay to be enterprising, but imagine what would become of
our noble profession (nay, the world!) if we forgot to -now and again-
remind one another to maintain adequately lofty levels of laziness?

It would upheave the very foundation on which Computer Science (and all
it entails, which is pretty much everything these days) was built!

I'm prepared though, I've got a sizable amount of post doves buried
in the backyard, just in case. Which reminds me, I should check their
expiration dates one of these days.

 -Carl
 
 -- 
 carl.d.wo...@intel.com
Non-text part: application/pgp-signature


Peace

-- 
Pieter
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: [PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-27 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
 You however, seem to be incredibly disciplined in this respect,
 so statistically speaking, you're destined to become typo-king,
 and you have every reason to be *proud* of it. :D

Thanks for the compliment (even if sideways)! I enjoyed the laugh.

 The only thing you could possibly have to be embarrassed about,
 is insufficient laziness (which, for programmers, is considered a
 virtue) ;)

And thanks as well for the gentle chiding. I hope to benefit from it.

-Carl

-- 
carl.d.wo...@intel.com


pgpUiZt6wlmGi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: [PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-24 Thread Pieter Praet
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:22:27 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
 On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:14:21 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
  Various typo fixes in docs, docstrings, comments, etc...
  
  Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
 
 Thanks for these fixes, Pieter!

My pleasure.

 I've pushed these all out now. I split the original commit up into 6
 commits that each touch different kinds of text, (non-code text files,
 comments within source files, error messages within source files, etc.)
 
 The idea there is that these different kinds of text have different
 potential impacts on the correctness of the code. So some release
 manager might be willing to include one kind of change, but not another,
 for example.

Agreed.

 Also, it made things a bit easier to read. There were two incorrect typo
 fixes in the original commit which I fixed:
 
  -\tSeveral notmuch commands accept a comman syntax for search\n
  +\tSeveral notmuch commands accept a command syntax for search\n
 
 This is now common syntax.
 
  -# Remember stdout and stderr file descriptios and redirect test
  +# Remember stdout and stderr file descriptions and redirect test
 
 This is now file descriptors.
 
 And one change where I left the original text unchanged:
 
* A non-NULL return value is guaranteed to be a valid string pointer
* pointing to the characters new/ or cur/, (but not
  - * NUL-terminated).
  + * NULL-terminated).
 
 This comment uses NULL to describe a NULL pointer and NUL to
 describe the ASCII character '\0'. (I know that NUL is a really
 annoying historically misspelled abbreviation, but it is in standard
 usage I believe---see ASCII(7) for example.)

Prime examples of or even made some new ones [1] :D

 Meanwhile, I was almost tempted to leave this misspelling unchanged:
 
  -(error %s is a file. Can't creat maildir. path))
  +(error %s is a file. Can't create maildir. path))
 
 Since that's also a classic historically misspelled abbreviation. ;-)
 
 Oh, and let me just thank you for being so thorough! There were several
 fixes you made that could obviously not be caught by an automated spell
 checker:
 
  ---part=id, (David Edmonson wants to rewrite some of notmuch show to
  +--part=id, (David Edmondson wants to rewrite some of notmuch show to
 ...
   (defun notmuch-user-other-email ()
  -  Return the user.primary_email value (as a list) from the notmuch 
  configuration.
  +  Return the user.other_email value (as a list) from the notmuch 
  configuration.
 ...
   (defcustom notmuch-after-tag-hook nil
  -  Hooks that are run before tags of a message are modified.
  +  Hooks that are run after tags of a message are modified.
 ...
  -The debian packaging exists in the top-level debian directory within
  +The Debian packaging exists in the top-level debian directory within
 
 Those all demonstrate a particular eye for detail—well done! For a
 couple of those, I almost gave them their own commits.
 
 In passing, let me point out the most amusing typo I saw in the patch:
 
  -} /* Appleasing Emacs */
  +} /* Appeasing Emacs */
 
 I almost hate to see that go, because I like the pleasing portmanteau
 sound of appleasing. Please applease me and leave this pleasing typo?
 
 Admittedly, that's not in code that's originally mine, so I can't say it
 wasn't intentional either.
 
 Finally, *many* of the typos and misspellings were originally mine. It's
 certainly embarrassing to see so many (and so many repeats). It was also
 embarrassing to see how many misspellings I committed while typing the
 commit messages, (fortunately I rebased many away).

Let's turn that around:

Comments and commit messages are (understandably) a mere afterthought
for most coders, including myself, and are thus often very terse or
even nonexistent, which automatically translates to less typos (y=kx).

You however, seem to be incredibly disciplined in this respect,
so statistically speaking, you're destined to become typo-king,
and you have every reason to be *proud* of it. :D

The only thing you could possibly have to be embarrassed about,
is insufficient laziness (which, for programmers, is considered a
virtue) ;)

 And now I'm starting to get paranoid about this message. Am I really
 brave enough to type words like embarrassing, misspelling, and
 committed here?
 
 Thanks again,
 
 -Carl
Non-text part: application/pgp-signature


Peace

-- 
Pieter


[1] id:1307202852-4398-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: [PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-23 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:14:21 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
 Various typo fixes in docs, docstrings, comments, etc...
 
 Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org

Thanks for these fixes, Pieter!

I've pushed these all out now. I split the original commit up into 6
commits that each touch different kinds of text, (non-code text files,
comments within source files, error messages within source files, etc.)

The idea there is that these different kinds of text have different
potential impacts on the correctness of the code. So some release
manager might be willing to include one kind of change, but not another,
for example.

Also, it made things a bit easier to read. There were two incorrect typo
fixes in the original commit which I fixed:

 -\tSeveral notmuch commands accept a comman syntax for search\n
 +\tSeveral notmuch commands accept a command syntax for search\n

This is now common syntax.

 -# Remember stdout and stderr file descriptios and redirect test
 +# Remember stdout and stderr file descriptions and redirect test

This is now file descriptors.

And one change where I left the original text unchanged:

   * A non-NULL return value is guaranteed to be a valid string pointer
   * pointing to the characters new/ or cur/, (but not
 - * NUL-terminated).
 + * NULL-terminated).

This comment uses NULL to describe a NULL pointer and NUL to
describe the ASCII character '\0'. (I know that NUL is a really
annoying historically misspelled abbreviation, but it is in standard
usage I believe---see ASCII(7) for example.)

Meanwhile, I was almost tempted to leave this misspelling unchanged:

 -  (error %s is a file. Can't creat maildir. path))
 +  (error %s is a file. Can't create maildir. path))

Since that's also a classic historically misspelled abbreviation. ;-)

Oh, and let me just thank you for being so thorough! There were several
fixes you made that could obviously not be caught by an automated spell
checker:

 ---part=id, (David Edmonson wants to rewrite some of notmuch show to
 +--part=id, (David Edmondson wants to rewrite some of notmuch show to
...
  (defun notmuch-user-other-email ()
 -  Return the user.primary_email value (as a list) from the notmuch 
 configuration.
 +  Return the user.other_email value (as a list) from the notmuch 
 configuration.
...
  (defcustom notmuch-after-tag-hook nil
 -  Hooks that are run before tags of a message are modified.
 +  Hooks that are run after tags of a message are modified.
...
 -The debian packaging exists in the top-level debian directory within
 +The Debian packaging exists in the top-level debian directory within

Those all demonstrate a particular eye for detail—well done! For a
couple of those, I almost gave them their own commits.

In passing, let me point out the most amusing typo I saw in the patch:

 -} /* Appleasing Emacs */
 +} /* Appeasing Emacs */

I almost hate to see that go, because I like the pleasing portmanteau
sound of appleasing. Please applease me and leave this pleasing typo?

Admittedly, that's not in code that's originally mine, so I can't say it
wasn't intentional either.

Finally, *many* of the typos and misspellings were originally mine. It's
certainly embarrassing to see so many (and so many repeats). It was also
embarrassing to see how many misspellings I committed while typing the
commit messages, (fortunately I rebased many away).

And now I'm starting to get paranoid about this message. Am I really
brave enough to type words like embarrassing, misspelling, and
committed here?

Thanks again,

-Carl


pgpr7oDhzHpxZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: [PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-05 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Pieter,

On Sat,  4 Jun 2011 17:54:12 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
 Because they cause global warming.
 
 Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
 ---
 
 TL;DR: Various typo fixes. Applies to jrollins/release-candidate/0.6 
 (2baf08f5)
 
 Due to the impending 0.6 release, I've gone off on an ephemeral typo hunt,
 and have brought back some trophies.
 
 As it's such an utterly amusing passtime, I've been pretty fat-fingered about 
 it,
 and wouldn't be surprised if I've missed some, or even made some new ones.
 
 Nonetheless: Lets maek 0.6 purrfec!

Yaeh !

/Xavier

P.S: good job !
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch