Your commit message is inconsistent with your change; is your intent to
return None or the empty string? Also, could you modify your commit message
to say what those are?
On May 9, 2011 3:06 AM, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote:
___
notmuch mailing
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:06:34 +0200, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote:
Now None is returned when those don't exist, which is inconvenient to
deal with.
I'm not using the python bindings, but from a philosophical point of
view, this change makes me a bit uncomfortable since it apparently
On 9 May 2011 08:20, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:06:34 +0200, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote:
Now None is returned when those don't exist, which is inconvenient to
deal with.
I'm not using the python bindings, but from a philosophical point of
view,
On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:20:41 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:06:34 +0200, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote:
Now None is returned when those don't exist, which is inconvenient to
deal with.
I'm not using the python bindings, but from a philosophical
On Mon, 09 May 2011 17:13:10 +0200, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote:
But those aren't message headers, those are thread properties. And I'd
argue that a thread always has authors and a subject (possibly empty).
The RFC says yes on the author, no on the subject. The only things
guaranteed
On Mon, 09 May 2011 11:23:16 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
The RFC says yes on the author, no on the subject. The only things
guaranteed are From: and originating timestamp. So I'm not sure why
subject should be guaranteed a string result and not, say, Cc.
Apologies -- I
On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:20:41 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:06:34 +0200, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote:
Now None is returned when those don't exist, which is inconvenient to
deal with.
I'm not using the python bindings, but from a philosophical
On 05/09/2011 09:00 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:20:41 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:06:34 +0200, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote:
Now None is returned when those don't exist, which is inconvenient to
deal with.
I'm not using
