On Tue, May 21 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Tomi--
>
> On Tue 2019-05-21 09:12:12 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> This looks like a good read:
>> https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/gdb/html_node/gdb_21.html
>> and is used to speculate below.
>
> Thanks for this pointer, and for the
On Mon 2019-05-20 23:32:20 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I wonder if most/all of our use of gdb could be replaced by writing
> simple shim libraries and using LD_PRELOAD.
I would have no objection to such a change -- it seems like a plausible
approach to me -- but i'm not prepared to write it (or
Hi Tomi--
On Tue 2019-05-21 09:12:12 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> This looks like a good read:
> https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/gdb/html_node/gdb_21.html
> and is used to speculate below.
Thanks for this pointer, and for the additional analysis.
While i understand this problem much better
On Mon, May 20 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> A marginally cleaner patch be to consistently use gdb with either one
> of:
>
> * -tty /dev/null
> * < /dev/null
This looks like a good read:
https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/gdb/html_node/gdb_21.html
and is used to speculate below.
I
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
> A marginally cleaner patch be to consistently use gdb with either one
> of:
>
> * -tty /dev/null
> * < /dev/null
>
> in all of T050, T060, and T070. But T070 can't use "< /dev/null"
> because it needs stdin. And when i tried to use "-tty /dev/null" in
> T050
